August Briefing: PreK, Dade, P-TECH, and more!

First Meeting.jpg


At a board briefing, the Dallas ISD School Board discusses items they will need to vote on in upcoming meetings. They also hear reports from the Superintendent & the Dallas ISD Administration on ways in which the district is meeting student needs. Below is a summary of the 6-hour briefing on August 8, 2019.


Trustee Briefing Image.jpg


Dallas ISD has 4 student outcome goals. The administration presented progress towards 2 of those goals.

  • Goal 1: Achievement in all subjects at “Approaches” or above will increase from 66% to 75% of students by 2022.

  • Goal 2: Achievement on 3rdgrade reading at “Approaches” or above will increase from 62% to 75% by 2022.

  • Goal 3: Achievement in two or more subjects at “Meets” or above will increase from 34% to 40% by 2022.

  • Goal 4: Participation in extra/co-curricular activities will increase from 59% to 65% participation by 2022.

The progress update for goal 1 showed a progress update for students achievement at “Approaches,” “Meets,” and “Masters” for grades 3-8, all subjects, comparing 2017-2018 to 2018-2019:

1 Student Outcome Goal 1b.jpg

For goal 2, the progress update related to student achievement in 3rd grade, with a focus on students who have participated in Dallas ISD PreK:

  • Since 2012, DISD has seen growth of 28% to 40% of students achieving “Meets” for 3rdgrade reading. 

  • DISD leads in growth compared to other North Texas school districts.

  • 44% of kids who attended 2015-2016 DISD PreK achieved “Meets” for 3rdgrade reading compared to 36% of kids who did not attend DISD PreK. 

    • 2017-2018: 24% of African-American students achieved “Meets” compared to 30% in 2018-2019

    • 2017-2018 and 2018-2019, 46% of Hispanic students achieved “Meets.”  

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Solis: This is a question for the board. When I look at Goal one, we are a point away from being where to want to be 2021-2022. I think we should take a hard look at the goals and progress. This is the type of district that is always looking for a new challenge.

  • TrusteeForeman: We test more students in Spanish compared to any other district in the state. What is the difference between the Spanish and English test? Is there a difference in the rigor of the Spanish test vs the English test? How many Spanish-speaking students are tested in other district?


Admin Presentation:

The Dallas ISD staff presented two ideas: Middle school Redesign and Innovation Engine.

“Middle School Redesign” – schools with accountability rating of “Competing” or better receive $50K funds from Office of Transformation and Innovation + weekly support to explore innovative models for their school.

  • Why? No DISD middle school has been approved through Public School Choice process; 8-10% of 5thgraders do not enroll in neighborhood middle school; align middle schools with high school programs.

  • Schools selected: Hill MS, Quintanilla MS, Richards MS, Spence MS, Walker MS. 

 “Innovation Engine” – provides up to 20 neighborhood schools with $50K to support innovative program or initiative.

In addition, new for 2019-2020 is a Single Gender IB STEAM Montessori. 

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Marshall: Excited to see the investment in our neighborhood schools. Question on slide 4 where the list of AIM schools. Has the list of AIM schools changed? Franklin is not going to be an AIM school. How was the AIM list created? 

  • Trustee Mackey: What is the balance b/t what teachers and principals want and the current portfolio of schools that already exist. Are we doing work around what parents want? Are we contacting them and figuring out what sort of options they want? 

  • Trustee Foreman: Concerns about community input. Many principals don't live in the area. Where is the money for the suitability of these programs? I want people in my district to have a choice but not just choice.


Admin Presentation:

Dallas ISD staff presented the idea of offering Leadership stipends for Dade Middle School during the 2019-2020 school year to 4 assistant principals, 4 counselors, 8 teacher leaders, and 3 campus instructional coaches.

They will also offer Retention stipends to the principal, AP, CIC, counselor, teacher leaders, and librarian for the 2020-2021 school year.

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Mackey: Want more information on how stipends will be applied at Dade.

#4 EARLY COLLEGE & P-TECH (Multiple links listed below.)

Admin Presentation:

The District is making moves to continue prioritizing early college and career readiness efforts with P-TECH.

Proposals for early college high schools:

Proposals for PTECH programs:

Board Discussion: none


For full video clips of board discussion or for a closer review of each agenda item. please visit the Board Docs site with all public materials.

Questions/Comments about this summary? Email 

June Briefing: Racial Equity, Student Transportation, and more!

Racial Equity.jpg


At a board briefing, the Dallas ISD School Board discusses items they will need to vote on in upcoming meetings. They also hear reports from the Superintendent & the Dallas ISD Administration on ways in which the district is meeting student needs. Below is a summary of the 6-hour briefing on June 13, 2019.



Dallas ISD has 4 student outcome goals. The administration presented progress towards 2 of those goals.

  • Goal 1: Student achievement on state assessments in all subjects at “Approaches” or above will increase from 66% to 75% by 2022.

  • Goal 3: Student achievement on state assessments in two or more subjects at “Meets” or above will increase from 34% to 40% by 2022.

The data below demonstrates results for first-time testers on 2017-2019 STAAR EOC.

Student Outcome Goals A.png
Student Outcome Goals D.png
Student Outcome Goals C.png

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Marshall: Proud of growth; time to focus on setting goals around “Meets” level rather than “Approaches.” Interested in how we are closing gaps for student groups.

  • Trustee Foreman: DISD is trailing behind the state.

  • Trustee Henry: Need to support African-American kids.

  • Trustee Flores: Gap for Hispanic students compared to state average shows progress.


Admin Presentation:

From 2014-2019, Dallas ISD has invested the following resources towards supporting racial equity: breakfast in classroom, holiday meals, EHGB policy to enroll eligible PreK3 and PreK4 students, early colleges, Dallas County Promise, strategic staffing at struggling campuses, FARE, and CAP.

Some of the progress the District has seen include achievement growth, reduction in underperforming schools, growth in graduation rate for students of color, and growth in early childhood for students of color. 

The Racial Equity Office has a purpose of “identifying disparities and inequities and bringing them to the attention of the department who implements change.”

The 2019-2020 Priorities will include 4 of 7 Pillars:

  • Academic Achievement, Equity, and Cultural Competence

  • Instructional Equity

  • Programmatic Equity

  • Internal and External Community Partnerships

  • Other pillars of office that are not priorities for 2019-2020 yet: Leadership & Operations, Workplace & Workforce Culture, and Facility & Location Impact

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Micciche: Encourage you to see progress in other districts and metrics we can emulate. Community participation is key (in advisory committees and councils). Communication is key (townhalls). 

  • Trustee Foreman: Appreciate outreach to community; let’s move forward with a defined plan.

  • Trustee Mackey: Excited to see outcome goals; Want a racial equity lens for every decision we make. Need support for teachers who will lead African-American and Mexican-American studies. Quality training is key (using metrics).

  • Trustee Johnson, Henry: Must include parents, students, and community members. Should have meeting minutes/summaries. 

  • Trustee Solis: Need definition for racial equity. If we do more for some, we need to immediately target resources to communities that need it the most. 

  • Trustee Marshall: Disappointed in pace based on our investment. Want more clarity on external partnerships.


Admin Presentation:

Dallas ISD selects schools that are eligible for additional funds - FARE - and the selection is dependent on: state rating of “D” or “F,” ACP data, STAAR data, historical accountability ratings, and percent of TEI proficiency on the campus.

The 2019-2020 campuses include: Rufus Burleson, Cedar Crest, Carpenter, Cochran, Truett, Wilmer-Hutchins ES, Atwell, Cary, Comstock, Dade, Florence, Kennedy-Curry, Holmes, Piedmont, Seagoville MS, Sam Tasby, Lincoln, Madison, Pinkston, Roosevelt, SOC, Wilmer-Hutchins HS.

The ethnic makeup at the selected campuses is 41% (7,050) African-American, 55% Hispanic, and 4% other.

Components of FARE include staffing, instruction, social-emotional support, extended learning, and partnerships.

Next steps: bring in six Literacy Lead Coaches funded through Racial Equity Office to support FARE schools. 

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Marshall: What is the difference between AIM, CAP, ACE, FARE? Very similar. 

  • Trustee Micciche: Schools not selected by political districts, just based on need? Yes.

  • Trustee Foreman: Each campus presents their unique needs vs ACE which prescribes? Yes.

  • Trustee Mackey: Focus on outcomes year-after-year to determine which programs/initiatives are getting results.


Admin Presentation:

In great part due to the persistent achievement gap between African-American and other student groups in Dallas, the District is introducing a way to reduce inequity and expand access to African-American students (and other previously ineligible students) for PreK.

Current eligibility criteria: low income, English language learner, military family, homeless, foster care, Star of Texas Award.

Proposed criteria addition – “Scholarship” as defined by:

  • Opportunity Gap: a member of the lowest performing subgroup on 3rdgrade STAAR; or

  • Language Opt-In: a student with limited English proficiency, regardless of native; or

  • Income: a student whose family income is above the PreK eligibility limit and less than or equal to 300% of the federal poverty level

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Marshall: For these criteria, how many more students do we project? At least 400 seats. Can we expand tuition PreK to all our schools? Not for 2019-2020, but we could expand for 2020-2021.

  • Trustee Solis: Would like universal PreK.

  • Trustee Foreman: Full support of new criteria. Hesitate to open PreK up to a larger universe. 

  • Trustee Micciche: Cost? Zero.

  • Trustee Mackey: Want universal but definitely see need to start with scholarship to prioritize greatest need.

  • Trustee Henry: Where does DISD offer tuition PreK3?Arlington and Hernandez.


Admin Presentation:

The focus for 2018-2019 has been on recruitment & retention, routes, and communication. 

  • Recruitment and Retention: Increased pay to $20/hr, offered perfect attendance incentives, offered retention bonus.

  • Routes: 847 total routes for tutoring, 2-mile radius pick-ups, special programs, special education, and other.

  • Communications Plan: parent meetings, call center, and parent advisory committee. 

Continued program Improvements include MyStop App, Special Education system, Task Force meetings, new buses, Bus Bulletin communication system, and Toyota Foundation partnership to assist process improvements with routes and fleet maintenance.

On time arrival went from 65% in 2017-2018 school year, to 70% in Fall 2018, to 95% in May 2019. District has not shared results of average for 2018-2019 school year yet.  

Board Discussion:

  • Trustees Micciche, Marshall: Great progress. 

  • Trustee Foreman: How long are students on the bus? Our goal is 1 hour, some are on the bus for 1.5 hours.

  • Trustee Mackey: Love app idea. Let’s look at route time, especially with racial equity lens. 

  • Trustee Johnson: Would like to know total cost for transportation department.

  • Trustee Solis: Let’s share the positive turnaround work of this department to build DISD’s momentum.


Admin Presentation:

This presentation related to a partnership between DISD and University of Pittsburgh. The partnership includes 14 schools: Marsh, White, N. Dallas, Spence, Dade, Lincoln, W-Hutchins, K-Curry, Atwell, Carter, Holmes, Kimball, Garcia, Adamson. 

The goal of the partnership is to “Increase number of students of color, low-income, and English learners achieving the literacy proficiency they need to be college and career ready.”

The 14 schools have created plans and will be implementing in 2019-2020. 

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Foreman: How do we measure impact? Will collect student work samples and follow the requirements of the grant.


Admin Presentation:

The purpose of the District Improvement Plan is to:

  • drive toward District Goals

  • focus the District’s Strategic Initiatives

  • align local and federal funds to goals & initiatives

  • align funds to data-based needs of campuses/staff/students

  • include needs assessment based on demographics, student academic achievement, school processes/programs, and perceptions

Student Outcome goals: Goals 1-3 are related to achievement, Goal 4 is related to extracurricular participation.

Strategic Initiatives: strategic compensation, early learning, collegiate academies, and public school choice.

Focus: theory of action & local accountability system, neighborhood schools, middle school initiative, racial equity, long range master facilities plan, long range technology plan, and retention of students & teachers. 

Board Discussion: None


For full video clips of board discussion or for a closer review of each agenda item. please visit the Board Docs site with all public materials.

Questions/Comments about this summary? Email 

May Briefing: Student Outcome Goals, Legislative Update, and more!

Dallas Kids First - May DISD School Board Briefing.jpg


At a board briefing, the Dallas ISD School Board discusses items they will need to vote on in upcoming meetings. They also hear reports from the Superintendent & the Dallas ISD Administration on ways in which the district is meeting student needs. Below is a summary of the 3-hour briefing on May 9, 2019.



Admin Presentation:

Dallas ISD has 4 student outcome goals. The administration presented progress towards 2 of those goals using preliminary data from the first administration of the STAAR exam for grades 5 and 8 in Math and Reading.

  • Goal 1: Student achievement on state assessments in all subjects at “Approaches” or above will increase from 66% to 75% by 2022.

  • Goal 3: Student achievement on state assessments in two or more subjects at “Meets” or above will increase from 34% to 40% by 2022.

Data below shows significant progress over the years. The outstanding concern is the gap between African-American student data and other student groups. See below:

Student Outcome Goal 1 & 3.png
Student Outcome Goal 1 & 3 B.png

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Micciche: Wow.

  • Trustees Marshall, Foreman, Henry, Blackburn: Let’s close the gap between African-American children and other student groups. 

  • Trustee Foreman: Need African-American children in PreK.

  • Trustee Blackburn: Need to target specific children who are not doing well. Ready to see collective action.

  • Trustees Flores, Pinkerton: Thank you!


Admin Presentation:

Dallas ISD has 4 student outcome goals. The administration presented progress towards goal #4:

  • Goal 4: Student participation in extracurricular activities will increase from 59% to 78% by 2022.

Activities included in this goal are:

  • Visual and Performing Arts

  • Department of Athletics

  • STEM Department

  • Student Activities: debate, cheer camp, UIL, etc.

Next steps: Look to expand the depth of participation, i.e., ensuring there are rigorous activities & engagement across the year.

Student Outcome Goal 4.png

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Marshall: I look forward to creating more ‘stretch’ goals since we are hitting our goals earlier than expected.

  • Trustee Pinkerton: Want to see this as “hitting two birds with one stone” to also care for kids after school hours.

  • Trustee Blackburn: Let’s identify student groups who may need more involvement.


Admin Presentation:

Superintendent Hinojosa shared the following:

  • There are currently two competing versions of a bill from House and Senate. Conference Committee has been appointed with members of House and Senate to resolve differences in legislation. 

  • Major differences between bills: 

    • Basic allotment: House version has a bigger increase compared to Senate version.

    • Property Tax Collection Revenue: House proposes prior-year values; Senate proposes current-year. 

    • Salaries: House proposes $1800 for all employees (not administrators); Senate offers $5000 for all teachers and librarians.

  • Under House version – $114 million new dollars for DISD

  • Under Senate version – $6.8 million new dollars (after taking out $5K for every teacher)

  • Next month DISD will be in a better position to adopt a budget for 2019-2020.

Board Discussion: none

#4 2019-2020 BUDGET PROPOSAL

Admin Presentation:

This presentation shared current formula budget projection for next year as well as budget proposals for the two bills under discussion by Senate and House. In other words, DISD won’t know where to spend funds until there is a clear outcome from the legislative session.

The Board will meet for a Board Workshop May 30th at 2pm to discuss how the “Fiscal Notes” below could be spent based on a list of 20+ suggestions from Superintendent and department leaders. 

Link 1: Proposed Budget

Link 2: Legislative Budget Possibilities

Link 3: Budget Priorities to be Considered/Discussed

Legislative Budget Comparisons.png
Budget A.png

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Foreman: Why is the recapture payment of the state categorized under contracted services? It is a payment of attendance credits we are purchasing from the state. 

  • Trustee Micciche: Why the decrease in ‘General Administration?’ Cost of TRE election. Student transportation? Software cost is less. 

  • Trustee Pinkerton: Want to ensure enrollment projection fits our planning for teachers, staff, etc.

  • Trustee Marshall: How were the fiscal notes prioritized? Each department submitted a recommendation.


For full video clips of board discussion or for a closer review of each agenda item. please visit the Board Docs site with all public materials.

Questions/Comments about this summary? Email 

April Briefing: TEI Updates, Summer Reading Program, and More!



At a board briefing, the Dallas ISD School Board discusses items they will need to vote on in upcoming meetings. They also hear reports from the Superintendent & the Dallas ISD Administration on ways in which the district is meeting student needs. Below is a summary of the 5-hour briefing on April 11, 2019.



Admin Presentation:

Dallas ISD administration has a plan to address two student groups that underperform: 1) rising 3rd , 6th , and 9th grade African American students 2) English Language Learners. The plan is to put in a place an intensive, targeted summer experience for students that includes touchpoints throughout the year. There are 750 eligible students (based on multiple measures of student achievement data).

The intention is to start small and target the following schools for Summer 2019:

  • Rising 3rd graders: Carr, Dunbar, Ervin, Pease, Rhoads, Truett, McNair

  • Rising 6th graders: Burleson, Dunbar, Ervin, Pease, Rhoads, Thornton, Truett, McNair, Wilmer-Hutchins

  • Rising 9th graders: Dade, Kennedy-Curry, Atwell, Browne, Holmes, Pinkston

The rising 3rd graders will be meeting at O.M. Roberts + R.L. Thorton. The rising 6th graders will be meeting at Dade MS + Atwell MS. The rising 9th graders will go to UNT Dallas.

By May 10, Dallas ISD admin plans to select the teachers who will participate (those with ratings of Proficient I or higher and experience in Reading and Language Arts). Included in the teacher selection is a commitment to include specialized dyslexia teachers to address student needs in a targeted manner. By May 17, the District will determine student acceptance into the program. Once students are selected, the district will crease student profiles with multiple measures to identify specific needs. Finally, the District will prepare professional development for teachers during the week of May 31-June 6.

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Marshall: Want to make sure we take the opportunity to identify and diagnose students with dyslexia.

  • Trustee Foreman: Will students be broken out or in same class? We will have a dual language class and general education class. Please keep the 12:1 ratio. I’d like to know how many 3rd graders have gone through PreK program and are not on-reading level. Want to make sure 9th graders have intensive focus.

  • Trustee Micciche: There are summer loss programs that are part of the City of Dallas, let’s work together to make sure we get as many students as possible into high-quality programs.

  • Trustee Henry: Want to ensure students have values/soft skills they can transition back to home school when the school year begins.

  • Trustee Blackburn: Glad to see we are explicitly addressing African-American students. Need to engage families.

  • Trustee Flores: Working with Racial Equity Office? Yes.


Admin Presentation:

Dallas ISD admin is working to address four areas of concern:

  • Continuous and ongoing review of TEI appraisal tool components to ensure transparency and equity.

  • Revise distribution of teachers to recognize 1) teacher growth and 2) improved student outcomes.

  • Conduct annual review of compensation model structure to ensure market competitiveness and leverage strategic compensation for retention.

  • Expand communication efforts to deepen system knowledge for all stakeholders

Proposed Changes for System Components:

  • Updated teacher performance rubric; expand training for evaluators

  • Updated version of student survey in April 2020

  • District assessments for kindergarten will not be required (teachers will go from category B to D)

Proposed Changes for Evaluation Ratings:

TEI Image.png

Proposed Changes to TEI Effectiveness Levels:

TEI Image 2.png
  • Allow effectiveness levels for to remain frozen for one additional year for those seeing a decrease.

  • Grandfather salaries for Exemplary II teachers, expand Master Teacher role.

Proposed Changes to Compensation Levels:

TEI 3.png
  • Increase compensation levels to align with market

  • Teachers will receive greater of a) increase based on effectiveness level, b) increase based on change to compensation, or c) board-approved increase

The budget for 2019-2020 is $17.1 million and the administration is asking the Board to accept a proposed $30 million.

A part of these recommended changes is to ensure strong communication plan for all stakeholders to understand the elements of TEI. The District plans to leverage TEI experts who will partner with campus leaders and provide on-campus training for system changes. In addition, the District will launch teacher-focused deep dives and expand the DTR Ambassador Program.

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Foreman: Concerns with forced distribution where bottom 3% of teachers receive low ratings. We are changing the rubric too often. Please share changes to student survey. How many DTR teachers? 2,100. DTR teachers do not have to apply every year. DTR teachers are Proficient II or higher. Salary schedule for experienced teachers? Ability to negotiate salary to match what they received outside of District.

  • Trustee Pinkerton: Very happy to see changes to Kindergarten teacher evaluation. However, TEI is not a best-practice system. I ask the Board to consider a different system.


Admin Presentation:

The counselor to student ratio in 2018-2019 is 1 counselor for every 399 students. The projected ratio for 2019-2020 is 1 counselor for every 377 students.

Historically, Dallas ISD’s highest ratio has been 1:651 and its lowest ratio 1:201.

The District is working to assess and diagnose the following: review job description and duties, prioritize responsibilities, conduct flow chart analysis of counseling accessibility, and propose recommendations to superintendent.

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Micciche: Want to see what we can do to bolster number of counselors we have.

  • Trustee Pinkerton: Want to recognize connection between counselor support and student outcomes.

  • Trustee Marshall: Definitely an area we want to invest in.


Presentation from Board President Flores:

Trustee Flores proposed amendments to the Board Policy for Board Member Ethics (see link above). Trustee Flores shared that the purpose of the policy is to reduce bullying by Board members of Dallas ISD staff.

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Flores: Existing ethics policy has not prevented that behavior. The policy would give the Board a tool against these items, including censure.

  • Trustee Foreman: Do not believe Board members should go to Board President when they have concerns about Board member performance. Need to be cohesive, not divisive.

  • Trustee Pinkerton: Could strengthen ethics policy. Do not favor including a censure mechanism in policy. d. Marshall: Currently do not have a mechanism for holding Board members accountable and not engaging in inappropriate behavior. Would want a tool.

  • Trustee Henry: If we can’t do it on our own, then we need a policy to set high expectations. Kids should be able to come to our meetings and say, this is a high functioning board. They respect each other, they remind me of my teachers. We should be a body that can act respectfully in agreements and in disagreements. Have we built a culture and environment to work issues out and talk to one another? The way this policy is written now, this is not going to work. There has to be enough respect to be able to sit and talk to work through whatever issue it may be.


For full video clips of board discussion or for a closer review of each agenda item. please visit the Board Docs site with all public materials.

Questions/Comments about this summary? Email 

1 vote, 5 minutes, 157,000 Kids: The Importance of Your Participation in School Board Elections

Dallas Kids First - Vote for Kids.jpg

At Dallas Kids First, we argue that the most important elected official is the school board trustee. Yet, it is not a priority for the majority of Dallas voters. If this is a statement that you disagree with – it is likely because you are included in the 7% average voter who shows up for school board elections year after year. For the other 93%, elected school board leadership just isn’t on their radar.

What do school board trustees do?

First – School board trustees set and monitor goals alongside the district’s superintendent, ultimately giving them the power to evaluate school performance. That’s huge! The body of 9 leaders get to determine how to measure success for 157,000 students and how to structure discussion at meetings in a manner that always leads back to this north star.

Second – School board leaders in Dallas are entrusted with approving and managing a $1.8 billion budget. No, they are not handed a blank check and asked to allocate funds; but yes, trustees have presented plans and have the power to either give the go-ahead or block the expense.

Third – school board leaders set policy under which the district’s schools are managed, arguably the most complex of the three responsibilities. This means each elected leader can take the initiative to revise or propose an idea to better serve students. An example may paint this picture best: It took the leadership of a trustee to propose free breakfast across all schools in a district where most families are considered “economically disadvantaged.” This was a new policy idea that revolutionized a students’ academic experience since the focus was now on their studies instead of an empty stomach.

So what?

Judging by the magnitude of the responsibilities a school board possesses, it is critical that more people participate in the vetting of and voting of really great candidates. Understanding the role is half the battle. The other half is voting for leaders that are a good fit for the 3 major responsibilities a trustee fulfills.

The Dallas Kids First team has at least 847 hours of observing board discussion and listening to board votes. Since 2012, the DKF team has been to every meeting: the monthly Board Briefing lasts an average of 7 hours (probably on a good night) and the monthly ‘voting’ meeting lasts an average of 4 hours. This investment of time and additional research by DKF has led us to identify research-based qualities that candidates and voters can use when considering leadership for school board.

What qualities does Dallas Kids First recommend for school board leadership?

  1. Focus on student outcomes (“Kids First Mindset”) – As a Trustee, it can be overwhelming to vote on a variety of topics related to budget, facilities, course offerings, etc. DKF believes a school board trustee should ensure each decision ultimately addresses the question: How will this impact students and how can my vote best serve all kids across DISD?

  2. Education Knowledge – It is critical that a trustee fundamentally understand student challenges in Dallas ISD and have knowledge of successes from other districts, states, or countries to provide potential solutions locally.

  3. Leadership Experience – School board trustees need to have transferable, proven, and relevant organizational leadership skills that would add value to the board, especially as it relates to working with diverse populations.

  4. Understanding of Trustee Role – You just read how complex the role of a trustee can be. It is critical that a school board member has an understanding of the role with a clear anchor & focus on improving student outcomes.

  5. Urgency – A school board trustee must approach challenges with a sense of urgency, a sense of personal responsibility, and an action plan for improving students’ education journeys in Dallas ISD.

  6. Community Partnership – A school board member must partner with the community on problem-solving and policy-setting towards improving student outcomes across the District.

Now what?

We invite you to lean into school board elections, just as our team has year after year. Our team initially started off with 4 neighbors volunteering time during elections to elevate expectations for school board leadership and has since evolved to empower community involvement on a year-round basis. The founding of the CAMP Fellowship (Campaign Activity and Management Program) under director John Hill has invited cohorts of 25 community members who represent the concerns & ideas of residents across Dallas and whom are all united by one common thread – a belief in making the city a better place through the education of kids in this city.

The CAMP Fellows and growth of the DKF team have allowed us to address blind spots and evolve to pursue a positive impact. In the fellowship are teachers, Dallas ISD students, education non-profit staff, parents, and other leaders from a wide range of ages and experiences. The commitment to engage in the community with a minimum of 30 hours of community service and 100 hours of talking to voters has resulted in not just the success of outstanding school board leaders but acquired learning from the community and the CAMP Fellows on the importance of this leadership for kids, families, and neighborhoods.

Election day is Saturday, May 4th– we hope when you make your mayoral choice and city council choice, you also consider a vote for standout school board leaders who have the potential to transform the lives of kids for the better. They’re just waiting for your vote.

March Briefing: Middle School Initiative, Special Education, and More!

DISD Students.jpg


At a board briefing, our Dallas ISD School Board discusses items they will need to vote on in upcoming meetings. They also hear reports from the Superintendent & the Dallas ISD Administration on ways in which the district is meeting student needs. Below is a summary of the 10-hour briefing on March 7, 2019.




Admin Presentation:

Dallas ISD Goal 2 states “Student achievement on the 3rd grade state assessment in reading at “Approaches” or above will increase from 62% to 75% by 2022.”  

There were mixed middle-of-year results from one assessment (ISIP) that showed gains for English test takers, a mixed decline for Spanish test takers, growth for African-American students year over year and a dip in the scores of Hispanic students. “Tier 1” is considered on grade level and results show:

  • English test takers in Kinder have 46% of students at Tier 1, compared to 45% last year. Spanish test takers at 62%, compared to 63% last year.

  • English test takers in 1st grade have 44% of students at Tier 1, compared to 43% last year. Spanish test takers at 55%, compared to 57% last year.

  • English test takers in 2nd grade have 53% of students at Tier 1, compared to 53% last year. Spanish test takers at 55%, compared to 58% last year.

CLASS scores come from observation of behaviors in classroom. The better a classroom does on CLASS, the better the students do in achievement (as seen by ISIP).

Looking ahead: continue focus on high-quality curriculum development; enhance and expand summer PD focused on new standards, continue rolling up new assessment (TX-KEA), and realign coaching support for classrooms with the highest need.

Board Discussion:

  • Why the dip for Hispanic students and Spanish test takers? Possible that teachers are not spending 50% of their time in Spanish and 50% of time in English. (Trustee Marshall)

  • What will we do different to get better results? Stronger curriculum in 1st and 2nd grade. Why instructional coaches only some places? Schools rated “Competing” and “Developing” receive coaches. (Trustee Pinkerton)

  • Why is a CLASS score not given to every classroom? It is matched to places where there is an early learning coach.  (Trustee Blackburn)


Admin Presentation:

Middle school grades are ‘make it or break it – students begin to disengage or leave DISD. There are indicators to know if a 6th grader is at higher risk of dropping out in high school – failing grade in Math or English, attendance rate of less than 85%, and unsatisfactory behavior mark in core course.

Dallas ISD is proposing a Middle school Initiative which would strengthen the school experience for students and positively impact future success in high school and beyond. Criteria for being included in the M.S. Initiative: “Developing” and “Focus” campuses, low student achievement data, historical factors, percentage of proficient teachers, and equity demographics. 

The Middle School Initiative would provide the following supports: strategic staffing, instructional excellence, social/emotional support, extended learning, and supportive partnerships. 

The structure would be a‘Teaming Approach’ - Break up school into small subsets of teams (ex: 6th grade team, 7th grade team, 8th grade team each have an assistant principal, a counselor, and 2-6 lead teachers under principal leadership.

An exciting aspect of the initiative is that it would help close achievement gaps for African American students since 5,000+ out of 6,000+ African American students in 6-8th grade would be recipients of this investment.

Superintendent Hinojosa mentioned that the cost of this initiative is $10 million. House Bill 3, if passed, could cover this cost. 

Board Discussion:

  • How many middle schools didn’t make this list? 10 schools. Let’s tie some of the supports to our equity initiative. For the Teaming Approach, concerned about varying sizes of schools & staff ratio. (Trustee Foreman)

  • Would want an investment in all middle schools to have forward-thinking planning. Also, wonder if ‘Master teachers under TEI are doing the work defined under ‘Lead Teacher’ for the teaming approach. How will we fund this if House Bill 3 does not pass? Look at budget again. (Trustee Marshall)

  • Plan if we don’t have enough funding? Narrow focus to four campuses. (Trustee Blackburn)

  • “We need to do this no matter what.” (Trustee Pinkerton)


Admin Presentation:

Dallas ISD administration proposed a Career & Technical Education Project which offers 22 credit hours for a certification. This would have a specific focus on construction, electrical technology, HVAC, and plumbing. Students in 9th grade would still attend classes at their home campus, 10th-12th grade students would be at a career institute for half a day 2x week and otherwise be at their home campus.

This is different than P-TECH since PTECH offers 60 dual credit hours for a degree, this program offers a certification.

The plan is to have four Career Institutes in each of the four quadrants of DISD. So far, two locations have been identified - north at Tom Field, south at Village Fair.

Board Discussion:

There was much discussion on the differences between the many offerings for high school students across the District. The image below represents the differences:

PTECH vs cte.jpg


Admin Presentation:

Dallas ISD Administration presented two data sets: graduation rates for student groups and out-of-school suspension rates for student groups.

Dallas ISD 2017 graduation rates of African-American, Hispanic, English Learner, and Economically Disadvantaged student groups exceeded statewide rates – students in Special Education lagged behind.

The Office of Racial Equity stated that the next steps to address the graduation gap for students in Special Education would be to expand programs to keep students engaged in school and expand partnerships that connect students to work after graduation.

For the suspension data, African-American students received referrals at a higher rate than other student group. Middle school grades had the highest suspension rates compared to other grade levels.

Next steps for the Office of Racial Equity is providing Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) training for staff, identifying schools with highest referral rates, and giving more time at high-needs campuses to SEL coordinators.

Board Discussion:

  • Want a strategic plan to address higher suspension rate for African American students. For SEL training, it must be ongoing. (Trustee Foreman)

  • Recommend not spending time on graduation rates compares to other metrics that may be more meaningful.  Let’s find out if there are schools with disproportionate rates of suspensions to target support there. (Trustee Marshall)

  • Want to see progress towards 7 strategic areas tied to the Racial Equity Policy we passed. Bring solutions, not just problems or information we already know. (Trustee Blackburn)

  • What is the role of an SEL coordinators? Assess campus support of students. (Trustee Pinkerton)

  • Want to compare how student groups are doing within DISD, not to other districts. Also want to be sure we don’t limit our thinking as we begin planning to address these issues (Trustee Henry)

  • Curious to know about reasons for students being suspended. (Trustee Solis)

  • Curious to know if suspensions are limited to specific groups. (Trustee Micciche)


Admin Presentation:

Over 18,000 applications to school choice options: collegiate academies, magnets, Transformation and Innovation schools (OTI). 1.   Transformation Schools are brand new, open enrollment using priority lottery, no academic entry requirement, and transportation is provided to all DISD students. Innovation Schools are redesign/neighborhood schools, new instructional model, maintain existing attendance boundary, and maintain existing staff.

Application breakdown between current DISD students (internal) and non-DISD students (external - could be living within DISD boundaries and attending non-DISD school or could live outside of DISD boundaries)

  • Collegiate Academies: 87% internal applicants, 13% external applicants.

  • Magnet Schools: 68% internal applicants, 28% external applicants, 4% PreK applicants.

  • OTI: 54% internal applicants, 23% external applicants, 23% PreK applicants.

Ethnic demographics of applicants is similar to district demographics.

Proposal for 2 new transformation schools: Exploratory Fine Arts, Digital/Visual & Creative Arts

Proposal for 6 new innovation schools: 5 personalized learning and 1 STEAM. These campuses would be across Districts 3, 6, 7, 8, and 9.

Board Discussion:

  • Want to know how many external students we accept and the difference between students who live within DISD boundaries. (Trustee Pinkerton)

  • Let’s develop a pipeline for students who don’t get into first choice so we don’t lose them. (Trustee Micciche)

#6 SPECIAL EDUCATION (Powerpoint available in Board Docs)

Admin Presentation:

This report shows implementation status of 16 recommendations on 5 key findings to support Special Education. Five findings include: clarity and direction in programming, equitable access to full continuum of services, staffing & organizational roles, systems of support to schools, and communication & engagement.

Student Performance shows: dropout rate is declining, performance on STAAR 3-8 exams has improved, students at ‘approaches’ or above has increased, and rating of “Improvement Required.”

Bright spots for status of implementing recommendations – evidence of progress for a core academic plan providing direction and programming, a “Does Not Qualify” review process, and bilingual leadership for Sp. Ed. 

Needs work for implementation: staffing and organization for the ARD Facilitation & case management. 

Takeaways: access and outcomes have improved, teachers and principals support efforts underway and seek continued improvement, and parents are appreciative of this focus but desire better communication, customer service, and opportunities to engage in decision-making. 

Board Discussion:

  • Marshall: Need to step up in this area. Want a new position for ARD and case management.

  • Foreman: Want to know how much money we get before we increase budget for Special Education.

  • Micciche: Want to ensure schools that have the Special Education Unit are also meeting needs elsewhere.


Admin Presentation:

This presentation is an update on the process used to select K-8 Reading & Language Arts instructional materials for 2019-2020, aligned to new TEKS, and designed to last for 10 years with digital & print resources. The new standards call for authentic integration of reading and writing and a focus on foundational learning (i.e., phonics).

The Dallas ISD administration is asking the board to approve resources to support this transition. Admin has had ‘roadshow’ for campus recommendations. Teachers have voted on the preferred resources and now admin must plan for implementing.

Board Discussion:

  • Which resources were selected? HMH, Fountas & Pinell, and Estrellita. (Trustee Pinkerton)


For full video clips of board discussion or for a closer review of each agenda item. please visit the Board Docs site with all public materials.

Questions/Comments about this summary? Email 

Dallas ISD School Board Candidates - Front Row Seat

Attending DKF’s community endorsement interview felt like such a critical opportunity for me as a passionate advocate for community and education. It was an eye-opening experience as my first time meeting candidates, even though I attended DISD for 10 years as a student and later worked for 5 years as an educator in two elementary schools.

I was joined by a diverse group of parents, fellow educators, non-profit representatives, business owners, and students, too, all just as fiercely passionate about holding our district accountable for improving opportunity for all students across the district.


Being front row, listening to and asking questions of candidates made me feel the weight of electing a well-qualified representative for trustee in a newfound, guttural part of my conscious. It was the feeling of my intuitive alarms going off, creating emotions of empowerment and frustration at the same time. 

I was genuinely grateful and enthused to see individuals outside of my own tight-knit progressive community seeking the same change and betterment for our kids. Yet, after several questions around my district's candidates and their backgrounds, I realized there must be obstacles keeping other experienced and qualified individuals from pursuing election as well — an issue I know is more complex than this reflection allows. 

After participating in the experience, I explored my own questions around metrics for school and district performance, policy-making and access to our elected representatives. Having seen my own family and friends become lost in a system and lose out on educational opportunities, I have deep personal connections to seeing the educational landscape in my hometown improve.

I look forward to using my experience to share my perspectives while canvassing, at discussions with colleagues and organizational partners, and helping all people across the city realize not only do students and families have a lot riding on these elections, but we all have skin in the game, and our votes are our play calls.

Election Day: May 4th

About Nancy Tien

Nancy Tien is in the CAMP Fellowship. She is an educator with five years of experience as a teacher leader in Dallas and Mesquite schools. After college, Tien, a Dallas ISD student, returned to the district as a 2013 Teach for America corps member. Throughout her years as a teacher, Tien volunteered on several campaigns to support candidates who put education at the forefront. She also worked to promote policy changes at the local school level to impact Dallas students. In the past year, Tien served as a Racial Justice Fellow with Teach for America, designing and facilitating group learning around identity work for Asian American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, Middle Eastern, North African, South Asian (AANHPI/MENASA) corps members. Tien continues her work for educational equity through continuing to volunteer and organize for campaigns and is currently planning to attend law school to further her efforts.

February Briefing: PreK Partnerships under SB 1882, Legislative Update, and More!

Trustee Solis on Partnerships.jpg


At a board briefing, our Dallas ISD School Board discusses items they will need to vote on in upcoming meetings. They also hear reports from the Superintendent & the Dallas ISD Administration on ways in which the district is meeting student needs. Below is a summary of the 6-hour briefing on February 14, 2019.


#1 SB 1882 Pre-K Partnerships (powerpoint AVAILABLE IN ‘BOARD DOCS’)

Admin Presentation:

Admin proposes 10 current PreK Partners to DISD operate under SB 1882 parameters. First five partners to consider for approval: Bryan’s House, Child Care Group, Good Street Learning Center, Heavenly Learning Center, and Mi Escuelita.

Stays same under current SB 1882 Partnership: DISD Teachers, DISD Students, Partner site.

Changes under SB 1882 Partnership:

  • Partner could refuse teacher placement. Teacher would still remain DISD employee.

  • Curriculum could be different if the partner chose to make a change.

  • Partner will report student performance metrics to DISD/Board for accountability.

  • Additional funds. DISD would receive funds from State, DISD would keep 10% of those funds and distribute 90% of those funds to partners.

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Foreman: Can this policy change to include other types of partnerships outside of PreK? Only PreK now. Worried about PreK students matriculating outside of DISD for Kindergarten.

  • Pinkerton: Concerned about representation of who is in control at partner site.

  • Blackburn: Is money only difference? Funding is a great advantage for improving care for kids over time.

  • Henry: What determines the 90%-10% split of funds? How does the district manage relationships with partner? 90-10% split is based on a different partnership model we have now. Contract will determine district’s relationship with partner.

  • Micciche: “We are sending our [DISD] employees to improve their [partner] programs.”

  • Marshall: Benefits to PreK programs? Students in DISD PreK outperform those who are not in DISD PreK, improvement in quality of education, access to quality PreK where there otherwise may not have been, and improving enrollment.

  • Solis: Does increased funding encourage new PreK partners for DISD? Yes. “Responsibility of our district to do as much as we can. We are in a position to re-engineer how our society works. We need a partnership like this because our kids and our community need to break out of poverty [via quality early childhood].”

#2 student outcome goals #1 and #3 (link to document)

Admin Presentation:

The District presented goal progress measures for two of the four district goals - #1 and #3. Below is the data shared with the board:

Goal 3.png

Takeaways: Students and staff surpassed goal progress measures for both goals 1 and 3. However, growth for all students compared to growth for African American students still has a gap – it is something the district is working to address.

Board Discussion:

  • Marshall: Let’s set higher goals! Proud of progress.

  • Henry: Thank you for focusing on African-American population.

#3 legislative agenda (no document to link)

Admin Presentation:

Superintendent Hinojosa shared an update on public school finance. At the state level, Public School Finance is now an “emergency item,” meaning that legislation can be passed within the first 60 days of the session. Bills focused on school finance should be filed within the next 10 days (before end of February).

Ideas being discussed for bills include: Increase basic allotment; Recapture funds being spent on public education; Fully funding PreK; Funds for strategic compensation.

Board Discussion:

  • Marshall: Thank you for advocating for better funding on behalf of DISD and TX students.

  • Micciche: Concerned about tax cap and funding schools.


Admin Presentation:

The board had to complete a self-evaluation and sign off they are not engaged in day to day administrative and operational issues.

The policy for a Citizen Advisory Committee was brought forth for recommended changes. This committee may be established by Board to assist Board, Superintendent, and District with:

  • developing educational programs and initiatives

  • gathering community input

  • improving transparency

  • bringing professional perspectives and experiences in areas where needed

The question brought for discussion was: Should Trustee appointments be residents from Trustee’s single-member district?

Additional information and policy change recommendations came from Trustee Pinkerton, Blackburn, and Foreman focused on: Need checks and balances for Board president. Proposed changes to board policy:

  • Officer may be removed from office by vote of a majority of the board. – as opposed to super majority.

  • Board shall approve committees as the board may deem necessary. Standing committees shall include, Audit Committee, Superintendent’s Evaluation Committee, and Policy Chair.

Board Discussion;

  • Solis: Policy doesn’t clearly state who has the power to create committees. I would propose giving the president power to vote, alongside other board members, when in a committee.

  • Marshall, Solis: Agree with changing from 6 to 5 board member approval for removing trustee from office.

January Briefing: New TAG Schools, Public School Finance, and more!

Justin Henry Public School Finance DISD.jpg


At a board briefing, our Dallas ISD School Board discusses items they will need to vote on in upcoming meetings. They also hear reports from the Superintendent & the Dallas ISD Administration on ways in which the district is meeting student needs. Below is a summary of the 8-hour briefing in January.


#1 Public School Finance (link to document)

Admin Presentation:

The Texas Public School Finance Commission members unanimously agreed on 34 recommendations for the legislature. This unanimous agreement does not mean the legislature will necessarily approve all 34 recommendations. Their report does not have specific funds tied to each recommendations at this point in time.

Recommendations include:

  • balance between state and local share of school funding (currently the state funds about 32% of public schools and local taxpayers fund 62% of the school district’s budget)

  • investing in low-income or underperforming student groups

  • reducing the growth rate of property taxes and relying on recapture

  • encouraging data-informed practice

  • operate with outcomes-based funding

Under recommendations, the savings to the state would include:

  • eliminating Chapter 41

  • eliminating Gifted & Talented funding weights

  • eliminating high school allotment

  • eliminating guaranteed per capita available school funding for Chapter 41

New Costs to State:

  • increase funding based on poverty

  • provide transportation based on mileage

  • provide 3rd grade reading allotment

  • provide 3rd grade reading outcomes funding

  • expand career & technical allotment to grades 6-8

  • full day PreK attendance

  • children of educators eligible for PreK

  • college, career, and military readiness funding

Dallas ISD Consultant recommends that the DISD School Board take a position on which recommendations to advocate.

School Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Marshall: Need a game plan for taking action. Would like more detail for each recommendation.

  • Trustee Henry: Don’t want to wait, there’s nothing more pressing for a school board member than what happens with public school finance.

#2 Campus Partnerships

Admin Presentation:

The District may establish partnerships for schools that would result in an additional $1,800 per student, aimed at supporting the partner’s specific expertise and supports at one DISD campus. Based on a rigorous application process that is considerate of the district’s needs, partners can be non-profits, governmental entities, or institutions of higher education. If the board approves the application, the district - in partnership with the applicant - would evaluate a performance contract used to establish the terms of the partnership, including:

  • expectations for academic performance

  • short-term financial performance

  • long-term financial stability

  • operational and governance performance

Superintendent Hinojosa stated that the current policy would not include partnerships with charter schools.

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Foreman: How will funds be distributed? Funding goes directly to schools and the performance contract would determine how the money would be used. Does Dallas ISD continue to supply technology, sports, field trips, etc.? Yes. Can Dallas ISD use the internal audit? Yes, we would recommend that.

  • Trustee Pinkerton: Want to ensure there is intention to make partnerships with organizations that have experience improving student outcomes. Want safeguards for including community members, educators, and families in the process early on.

  • Trustee Marshall: Would want there to be a vote on each partnership agreement for each campus - not across more than one school campus. And, can you give an example of a difference in the day of an employee at a partner campus vs. a non-partner campus? Example - school calendar could look a bit different.

#3 Student Outcome Goal 4 (link to document)

Admin Presentation:

The administration presented progress towards meeting district goal 4, which states: “Student extracurricular or co-curricular participation will increase from 59% to 78% by 2021-2022.

Overall, the district is on track towards meeting this goal. Breakdown by grade level:

  • Elementary school participation is at 79.2%; its goal is to reach 82% by 2021-2022.

  • Middle school participation is at 75.8%; its goal is to reach 76.6% by 2021-2022.

  • High school participation is at 68.4%; its goal is to reach 71.6% by 2021-2022.

No board discussion.

#4 Athletic Opportunities for Students (link to document)

Admin Presentation:

The administration shared information regarding its offerings for students. At high schools, boys and girls each have 10 options for sports. In middle schools, boys and girls each have 6 options for sports. Currently, the administration is working to better utilize UIL-allowed athletic periods, fill all available coaching slots with qualified teachers & coaches, improve summer strength and conditioning programs, and identify funds to begin training 3rd-6th grade students.

Next steps will be to standardize athletics as a part of the master schedule students have.

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Foreman and Micciche: Nurturing the whole child is important; sports gives students another way to learn.

#5 Multi-tiered systems of support (link to document)

Admin Presentation:

The administration presented a new system, used to be Response to Intervention, which is based on 3 pillars of support: academics, language, and engagement. Findings from a Special Education report by Dr. Collier showed 3 trends to which the district is responding:

  • Staff viewed interventions as a compliance-based process. Now, DISD has built in professional development and new curriculum to focus efforts on good, first instruction when students are learning a concept for the first time. The is ‘Tier 1 Instruction.’

  • Teachers felt intervention system was complicated. Now, DISD will use a different management system called ‘Power School’ which has already led to fewer teachers reaching out with troubleshooting.

  • Parents and teachers were confused on pre-referral supports. Now, DISD has monthly meetings to review data and clarify the intervention process for all relevant parties.

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Foreman: How have teachers weighed in? Teachers and counselors shared input through Planning Committee Sessions and through curriculum feedback survey. In addition, each campus has a representative for this system.

  • Trustee Pinkerton: How many students have we identified as needing support? 13,000 students.

  • Trustee Flores: Does this support allow us to identify student needs earlier? Screening process should help.

#6 Long-range master plan for technology phase 1 implementation (link to document)

Dallas ISD technology implementation long-range master plan.png

Admin Presentation:

This presentation was designed to bring context to upcoming contracts as the district team rolls out its 3-year technology implementation plan.

The district has already completed a Wi-fi assessment, digital curriculum, implementation of Power School student information system, and delivered professional development to use technology tools and infrastructure effectively.

The district is in the midst of deploying devices to campuses, updating IT policies & procedures, and approving contracts for additional planning.

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Foreman: Is there a plan to replace devices over time? Yes, built out a 10 year plan.

  • Trustee Pinkerton: Is the money for these efforts from the 2015 bond? Primarily but not exclusively. Would like to know how much more money is needed for the remainder of the implementation plan.

  • Trustee Blackburn: How does the one-to-one device ratio work? Core classrooms will receive a set of devices so that each student in the classroom has access to a device. This means that as students rotate through their class schedule and visit core classes, they will have access to a device.

#7 Mills & Twain - talented and gifted schools proposal (link to document)

Admin Presentation:

There is not a TAG facility in Districts 5 or 6 in Southern Dallas. Providing talented & gifted programming would aim to provide equitable opportunities for students living in these districts.

First proposal is to have a Grades 1-8 TAG at Mills. In Fall of 2019, Mills would start with grades 1-6. Students who are currently at Mills and do not qualify for the TAG would have the benefit of staying on the campus. Moving forward, any student currently zoned to attend Mills would now be rezoned to attend Cedar Crest.

Second proposal is to have a Grades 1-5 TAG at Mark Twain. Same as Mills, students who are currently at Twain and do not qualify for the TAG would have the benefit of staying on the campus. Moving forward, any student currently zoned to attend Mark Twain would be rezoned to either Carpenter or Turner.

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Foreman: Thank you!

  • Trustee Marshall: Great news. Why grades 1-5 at Twain? Space and it is a model that other districts have seen to be successful.

  • Trustee Blackburn: Concerned about transportation of students who would have to walk. Please make sure the routes are safe or transportation is accessible.

  • Trustee Henry: Want to make sure that the new TAGs in the Southern sector don’t take away from resolving the underrepresentation of student groups or other issues that need attention in existing TAG’s across the district.

#8 Self evaluation, board evaluation, & board policy (link to document)

Presentation from Trustee Foreman:

Trustee Foreman led this presentation with 3 key questions -

  1. Is the board president within their right to appoint themselves to the audit committee?

  2. Is the board president within their right to select an attorney for legal matters without consulting the board?

  3. Is the board president within their right to deny a trustee access to counsel?

The board lawyer was not available but the district lawyer answered that from what is available to her in policy, the board president is within their right on all of the items stated above.

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Pinkerton: Want to make sure there is a system of checks & balances.

#9 Recruitment incentives (link to document)

Admin Presentation:

There was not a presentation from the administration; however, the powerpoint slides were posted describing the intent of the recruitment incentives. These incentives are aimed at attracting candidates to secondary math, secondary science, career & technology, special education, and elementary bilingual.

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Marshall: Every year I worry and share the feedback that we should be increasing overall salaries for teachers who are teaching in these high-need courses rather than using a recruitment incentive that could very well result in the teacher leaving after they receive the incentive.

  • Trustee Foreman: Want to see which teachers we retain from this incentive program.


For full video clips of board discussion or for a closer review of each agenda item. please visit the Board Docs site with all public materials.

Questions/Comments about this summary? Email 

December Briefing: Bond Phase 3, Racial Equity, and more!

hinojosa racial equity.jpg


At a board briefing, our Dallas ISD School Board discusses items they will need to vote on in upcoming meetings. They also hear reports from the Superintendent & the Dallas ISD Administration on ways in which the district is meeting student needs. Below is a summary of the 8-hour briefing on November 29, 2018.



Admin Presentation:

PreK continues to produce meaningful results in transition from ISIP to new K-ready assessment: TX-KEA. The TX-KEA assessment measures: Language, Literacy, STEM, Social Emotional, Executive Function, + Academic Motor Skills. ISIP will continue to be the progress monitor tool in the meantime (during the transition).

Key Benefits – 

  • Goes beyond just a literacy focus compared to what district has used in past. 

  • TX-KEA mirrors assessments students will see in 1stgrade and beyond.

  • Teacher and student work together 1:1 through questions, giving teacher info in multiple ways. 

  • ISIP is norm-referenced where KEA is criterion-referenced (like STAAR).

Literacy-Reading Composite score will be shared with TEA – 

  • Sept. 2018 results show 70% students on track. 

  • Students in DISD PreK outperforming those not in DISD PreK (but eligible) by 39 percentage points.

Comparing students’ performance on both TX-KEA and ISIP assessments – 

  • 42% of students who took both ISIP and KEA are on track according to both ISIP and KEA, 28% not.

  • 4% of students on track according to ISIP but not KEA; 25% on track according to KEA but not ISIP.

Looking ahead: Continue K-12 curriculum development, prepare for new 2019-2010 TEKS, roll up TK-KEA will one year at a time with each class of students, expand PreK3 and PreK4, + focus on coaching quality.

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Foreman: Comparison of students calls ineligible PreK students ‘affluent’ though they may be ineglibile for different reasons (i.e., parent in the military) – needs clarification. Good point. How long is the assessment? Time is spread out over multiple days. 

  • Trustee Pinkerton: Exciting to see 1:1 testing for more accuracy. Any other assessments to measure skills that may not be included? Yes, as an example: running records for reading. PreK enrollment? 3,400 PreK3, 9,600 PreK4.

  • Trustee Marshall: How are we testing social-emotional component? Teacher completes checklist over 4-6-week observation. Concern on norming teachers for assessing students. We have and will continue to train teachers, and more importantly, to use information afterwards.

  • Trustee Henry: What does the assessment look like over time? District gave suggestion of timeline. Teacher uses technology to scroll through questions and the student verbally shares response. What feedback do students get? Teacher can suggest activities for home practice with parents.When is assessment completed? This year, only required once a year - September. Does this assessment allow for comparison outside of TX?No, only TX districts. Does only one teacher provide feedback? Yes.


December Briefing.jpg

Admin Presentation:

The Dallas Education Foundation: 501C3 nonprofit designed to raise philanthropic funds for district.

Benefits of DEF:

  • additional resources would enhance educational programs

  • builds communication with community

  • can raise awareness of district needs

  • invites community to be a part of solution. 

Where the district is: Wants the foundation to be integrated with DISD, foundation must reinstate its 501C3 status and its governance structure. District has created a Memorandum of Understanding to protect DISD by approving the support for DEF & itemizing the commitment from the district and from the foundation. 

Next steps: Re-launch the foundation, confirm the board of directors, launch an ED search, identify funding priorities, and develop a plan of work. Ultimately, need approval of MOU.

Board Discussion: 

  • Trustee Marshall: Fully supportive. Elaborate on part-time ED? Part DEF, part district-employee = full time position. Please plan for growth of DEF team; need ED with deep relationships in business & philanthropy network.

  • Trustee Foreman: Historical perspective – experienced challenges. Don’t see goals, timelines, etc. How to hold DEF accountable? There is a strategic plan in place, we can share & make more specific. Can you share past disbursement of funds? Yes. Difference between Volunteer Partnerships and DEF? DEF is focused on corporate donations; VP is focused on specific needs (washer/dryer, etc.).

  • Trustee Solis: Let’s get it right this time. Understand tension between having goals and having someone (ED) to create goals. Suggestion – let’s shorten the 3-yr plan to a 1-yr plan, then build out if we trust the work.

  • Trustee Pinkerton: Appreciate generosity of Dallas philanthropy. Agree, let’s get it right this time. Are we in good standing to launch? Yes – all corporate documents filed. Can we cap administrative spending if the DEF team were to grow? Can discuss and get board approval. Agree with Solis about 1-yr plan.

  • Trustee Henry: Agree on 1-yr period. Agree on exceptional talent for ED hire. ED should have strategic plan on goals, though MOU could include some measurements before the hire.

  • Trustee Blackburn: I’d like copies of past by-laws to ensure we get it right. Would like reports to share periodically with board. There is a retroactive payment from 2016 in the MOU? – Let’s take that out if possible.

  • Trustee Micciche: Let’s take a real hard look at why DEF has not succeeded in the past.


Admin Presentation:

Using the data from the Long Range Master Plan and the corresponding proposal from the Strategic Facilities Plan Version 1.1, district has detailed its recommendations for Phase 3 of the 2015 Bond. 

For Long Range Master plan, needed $1.6B to complete projects, specifically when looking at priorities 1 and 2.

  • Priorities 1: critical replacements of equipment & systems with 0-2 years left of utility.

  • Priorities 2: replacements of equipment & systems with 3-5 years left of utility.

In Phases 3-5 of Bond program, there were 121 projects identified. We have funding for $450M for these phases. Would need additional $1B to target priorities 1 and 2 for those 121 projects. 

Developed criteria to select projects for phase 3 from the original 121 – 

  • Facilities Condition index (FCI) Schools Ranking: highest (worst condition) to lowest (best condition).

  • Concentrate remaining dollars to schools that have not had any work done to them.

  • Address high schools as quickly as we can – recommend moving all high school projects forward.

  • Any building that exceeds 300 students, would be considered a part of phase 3 (if available funds).

  • Won’t put money into schools that need to be replaced in the future.

  • Maximum of 4 schools per district for each of the 9 districts. Ultimately selected 3 for each district.

Admin recommends 27 schools for phase 3 of bond program: Rosemont, North Dallas, Pershing, Gooch, De Zavala, Webster, N. Adams, B. Adams, Madison, Gill, Chapel Hill, Casa View, Donald, Carr, Silberstein, Hill, Holland, Martinez, Lanier, Jordan, Anderson, Central, Bonham Solar Prep, Mt. Auburn, Pinkston, Sunset, Rogers.

The 27 schools total $440M. We would have a $10M buffer. Admin reduced bond program to 3 phases (originally it was 5) to address school needs more quickly. 

Hope for future bond program that allows district to move all schools up to standard.

Following through with these recommendations allows: all high schools in great shape, makeover at several schools in every part of town, and shows taxpayers what our schools could look like for a future bond. 

Board Discussion:

Pinkerton: Concerns about Rosemont and its lower price tag. How do we tackle critical needs at other schools not on the list of recommended projects? We will utilize the maintenance department.

  • Trustee Marshall: The data we used for the 2015 bond compared to the facilities assessment data we received in the last year has resulted in a different prioritization of campus needs. We can’t get bogged down on different approach for a single school, need to stay macro so that we can prioritize across district.

  • Trustee Foreman: Some schools repeatedly receive bond money. Let’s make sure we are equitable.

  • Trustee Solis: Martinez has grown, what does support look like? Listed with priority 3 items (i.e., expand library).

  • Trustee Blackburn: Please consider growth in West Dallas when planning for Pinkston (Carr and De Zavala, too).

  • Trustee Micciche: Consider a bond program sooner than 2021 without raising the tax rate. Possible 2020 bond with big voter turnout.(Pinkerton – commercial paper program could help.)

  • Trustee Resendez: Please get FCI score for Pleasant Grove TAG School. That is a concern.


Admin Presentation:

Office of Racial Equity has chosen 3 areas of focus for quantitative data share: student access to schools of choice, enrollment of African American students, and student achievement on Advanced Placement exams. 

Data Point 1: Student Access to Programs by group – 

Early College High Schools.jpg
High School Magnets.jpg
Magnet Middle Schools.jpg
Elementary Magnets.jpg
Lottery High Schools.jpg
Lottery ES and MS.jpg
Montessori and IB.jpg

Data Point 2: Student Enrollment

  • Admin presented a slide that demonstrated, on average, African American enrollment in the district has remained at a steady 22/23% of total district enrollment since 2014.

Data Point 3: Student Achievement on Advanced Placement Exams (AP)

AP Scores.jpg

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Henry: I see huge inequities. We have to start acting on this. This isn’t an issue just for DISD, but across the nation. I believe DISD can lead the way on this. 

  • ForeTrustee man: It all comes back to access, and for me, it’s by design. 

  • Trustee Solis: The data are what the data are. We need to see this, and we should not be afraid of being bold. 

  • Trustee Pinkerton: Nothing new to add considering my colleagues’ statements. 

  • Trustee Micciche: We are all behind this and have been behind equity from the beginning of this process.


Admin Presentation:

This agreement allows district to partner with other entities through SB1882 (higher ed institutions, non-profit organizations, or governmental entities). The schools and students that are a part of the partnership would still be DISD students and schools. This policy is required for the district to participate in partnerships. It is also a TASB recommendation, and the district’s legal department has made edits.


  • performance contracts will be generated to outline parameters for partnerships

  • schools will gain autonomies as participants (ex: adjusting calendar year or school-day schedule)

Potential Drawbacks:

  • If we engage in this process, there would be a governing body that supervises the campus principal, called “chief officer.”

  • There are also some non-negotiables – governing body would have purview of curriculum – but the district can negotiate this as it seeks partnerships.

  • Academic and financial goals are also decided on by this governing board.

Board Discussion:

  • Trustee Foreman: This reminds me of the home-rule charter, where partnership board takes away from the DISD School Board’s role. Concerned about who makes up the application review committee. 10-yr contracts with partners? Upto 10 yrs for the partner, but required 10-yr for in-district campus.

  • Trustee Pinkerton: Why this need? DISD has made progress; partnerships enhance opportunities + resources for schools. Partnership would also have to be very unique and exciting before we consider partnership. Do we have any partners in mind? Yes, some ideas. DISD’s role? Details in performance contract would outline those specifics. Policy approval allows district to have partnership option – does not obligate it. Please run analysis on additional funding per student + consider board input for the application committee.

  • Trustee Marshall: Before we sign off, want to understand who is in charge of what (i.e., Who hires teachers?). We will share a sample of an agreement. If DISD is doing well, want to be careful proceeding forward by relinquishing authority. Let’s see what proposals bring us, we have plenty of schools in need.

  • Trustee Blackburn: Who pays for these partnerships? TEA gets final approval after DISD School Board approves. 

  • Trustee Henry: Can school board identify someone to be on the governing board? Yes. What other examples of responsibility can you share on the partner side? Partner could get final say on DISD employee hire at the campus. Shortest agreement? 3 yr. Primary concern - governance.

  • Trustee Micciche: What do we mean by charter? In-district charter, someone with whom we enter into agreement. Don’t want anyone to get impression we are turning our schools over to competitors at charter schools.

  • Trustee Pinkerton: Example of partnerships with governmental entities?City partnered with San Antonio ISD to support Pre-K.


For full video clips of board discussion or for a closer review of each agenda item. please visit the Board Docs site with all public materials. Questions about this summary? Email 

November Board Briefing: TEI, Principal Group, and School Building Plans

Jaime Resendez Quote.jpg


At a board briefing, our Dallas ISD School Board discusses items they will need to vote on in upcoming meetings. They also hear reports from the Superintendent & the Dallas ISD Administration on ways in which the district is meeting student needs. Below is a summary of the three-hour long briefing on November 1, 2018.


#1 Local Accountability Framework

Dallas ISD is evaluated by three systems: State Accountability, School Performance Framework, and a Local Accountability System. The Local Accountability System, or LAS, is a new effort to develop a system where DISD has more autonomy in determining how to measure performance at schools. The ratings include: Accomplished (“A”), Breakthrough (“B”), Competing (“C”), Developing (“D”), and Focused (“F”). The six domains considered for generating a score are:

  • Domains 1-3: State Accountability (50% of score)

  • Domain 4: Academics (30% of score)

  • Domain 5: Culture and Climate (10% of score)

  • Domain 6: Student Experience (10% of score)

Board discussion included questions from a few board members (Marshall, Blackburn) on why the new LAS score is needed and concerns on the way in which it may confuse parents & community members when they see two different school scores. Pinkerton and Henry asked about the implications of the district having lower scores for schools compared to the state and the administration responded that the LAS was once an internal measure that raised the expectations for achievement across schools, which accounts for the difference. Resendez asked about the possibility of continuing to keep LAS as an internal measure so that the district doesn’t confuse the community with multiple scores. The administration said it is a consideration.

Screen Shot 2018-11-02 at 6.52.30 AM.png

Across campuses, the district will distribute scores using the following distribution in its first year. After the first year, campuses will not be ‘forced’ into a rating, they will have the ability to move from one rating to another depending on performance from each domain.

#2 Strategic Facilities Plan

The Long Range Facilities Plan that the district uses functions as a database which shares assessments of schools, utilization, condition of facilities, etc; whereas, the Strategic Facilities Plan is a more dynamic plan that changes as the district plans to modify existing schools to meet needs of the district.

For the funds remaining form the 2015 bond, the administration recommended that the board modify the original plans for those funds to consider a new plan. The new plan was created based on two criteria: enrollment and facilities condition. Depending on these two items, a school would be considered for modifications. The schools listed for change included:

  • 2 demolitions: Fannin, Estes

  • 2 closures: Fannin to consolidate with North Dallas High School; Estes to be sold or demolished with students moving to Village Fair

  • 17 new campuses: Hawthorne, Peabody, Hall, Rhoads, Kiest, Geneva Heights, DeGolyer, Hexter, Reilly, Walnut Hill, Urban Park, Pease, Atwell, JQ Adams, Longfellow, Marcus, DESA.

Board discussion included comments from Trustee Solis asking the administration to thoughtfully consider demographic changes in neighborhoods as well as racial equity when generating plans. In addition, many trustees thanked the administration for bringing this plan to replace an earlier version that raised many concerns across the district.

#3 Superintendent’s Principal Group

The Superintendent has a Principal Group whose purpose is to get feedback from some of the highest-performing principals in the district and to give them the opportunity to connect and learn from one another. Selection of the principals is considerate of academic success on their campus and diversity of members in regards to race, gender, and school experience.

There were three principal participants present to share the takeaways from their experience. They agreed that a great benefit was learning from one another and staying current on the work & role of the Superintendent and his team.

Board discussion included a comment from Trustee Pinkerton asking for opportunities like this to be available to others. Trustee Henry asked how the board members could best support principals. In response, the principals shared that trustees should walk a school with them to gain perspective. They also responded that they would like the board to ensure there isn’t a disconnect between the schools and the community. Trustees Solis and Micciche asked about their experience - all three principals began their journey as educators through non-traditional programs and all three principals have a shared vision of focus on students.

#4 Teacher Excellence Initiative (TEI) Update

The administration began this part of the agenda with a note on two items worth celebrating: 20% of schools on the Improvement Required list (lowest state rating for a school) has gone down to 1% in just four years. Plus, the district is closing the gap between the state’s average performance and the district’s average performance.

In relation to TEI, the evaluation and compensation system for teachers, there are three components: teacher performance from observations, student experience as determined by surveys, and student achievement on state/district assessments.

Teachers are placed in one of four categories - A, B, C, D - and depending on their category, they are rated using the following percentages:

Screen Shot 2018-11-01 at 2.55.22 PM.png

Using this rating system, teachers receive a performance level of: Unsatisfactory, Progressing, Proficient, Exemplary, or Master. Because this system is also about compensation, the administration pointed out that 97% of teachers received a pay increase. Only 3% of returning teachers did not. Overall average increase in salary was 2.9% compared to the market average of 2%.

Board discussion included a question from Trustee Foreman on how many teachers in the district are not evaluated under TEI - the response was a little over 250 out of 10,000. She also wanted to ask that all teachers have a student experience survey included in their rating. Trustee asked if with more funds the administration about the possibility of changing the forced distribution ratings of TEI to ensure more teachers are reaching proficiency levels or above. The administration responded that it is possible.

Trustee Blackburn asked about how the district defines ‘an excellent teacher for all’ - and the administration replied that it would be a teacher with a rating of proficient or higher in every class and equitable distribution of higher-rated teachers for highest-need students. Trustee Resendez advocated for ensuring we support our teachers to receive a proficiency level or higher - despite cost implications - even with potential cost for paying higher-rated teachers - the list cost savings are immeasurable.

#5 Board Self-Constraint, Self-Evaluation, & Training

The board has a Governance Committee whose focus is to review the board’s operating procedures, onboarding training, and board policy. Trustees Henry, Solis, and Resendez and shared some documents with the other board members during this briefing, though there was no public discussion. In addition, the board and administration did not discuss the board self-constraint or self-evaluation.

#6 Update to Student Outcome Goals

The original student outcome goals state:

  1. Student achievement on state assessments in all subjects at Approaches or above will increase from 66 percent to 75 percent by 2022.

  2. Student achievement on the third-grade state assessment in reading at Approaches or above will increase from 62 percent to 75 percent by 2022.

  3. Student achievement on state assessments in two or more subjects at Meets or above will increase from 34 percent to 40 percent by 2022.

  4. Student participation in extracurricular or co-curricular activities will increase from 59 percent to 65 percent by 2022.

The updated and potential student outcome goals for 2021-2022:

  1. Student achievement on state assessments in all subjects in Domain 1 will increase from 39 to 47.

  2. Student achievement on the third- grade state assessment in reading at the Meets performance level or above shall increase from 32.5% to 45.0%. 

  3. The percent of graduates who are college, career, or military ready (CCMR) from Domain 1 will increase from 45.0% to 49.0%. (This is lagged 1 year.) 

  4. Student extracurricular or co- curricular participation will increase from 59.0% to 78.0%. 

#7 Adult Education

Purpose of adult education classes is to remove language barriers for parents. These classes will encourage parents to engage in their kids’ campus experience by eliminating the language barrier.


For full video clips of board discussion or for a closer review of each agenda item. please visit the Board Docs site with all public materials. Questions about this summary? Email 

October Board Briefing: Dallas ISD's Legislative Agenda, Teacher Curriculum, and More!



At a board briefing, our Dallas ISD School Board discusses items they will need to vote on in upcoming meetings. They also hear reports from the Superintendent & the Dallas ISD Administration on ways in which the district is meeting student needs. Below is a summary of the three-hour long briefing on October 4th, 2018.



Third grade reading is incredibly important for the future of a student’s life, therefore, the district has a goal which states: “Student achievement on the 3rd grade state assessment in Reading at “Approaches” or above will increase from 63% to 75% by 2022.”  The administration presented progress for last year’s 3rd grade cohort with the following:

Oct Briefing Image.png

The data highlighted a difference of 43% of students who attended Dallas ISD PreK at ‘meeting’ standard compared to 35% of students ‘meeting’ state standard who did not attend Dallas ISD PreK. The data also shows that the district is performing higher than the state’s overall average. The district team will continue to build in benefits for students in the early grades to support them leading up to 3rd grade. 

Dallas ISD not only is leading in year-over-year growth in 3rd grade reading, it is one of two districts that experienced growth. This trend is similar when looking specifically at African-American students and Hispanic students. Right now, the board has a goal of 40% of all students to be at Meets level – 46% of Hispanic students are at ‘Meets’ level. This population of students is exceeding this goal. We should see this continue to improve.

The trustees shared their pride in the growth and progress for students served in the district under the administration’s leadership. Trustee Solis wondered about a comparison to other districts who have invested in early childhood both within the state and beyond.


Dallas ISD is finalizing a legislative program to advocate at the state level in support of local district goals and needs. During the meeting, the board and district leadership team narrowed down their focus to a clear top three priorities. Because the midterm elections may bring about some changes, a meeting to finalize the legislative priorities will occur after November 6th where the district will meet with the Dallas delegation of legislators.

The top three priorities include: 1) Recapture funds to be spent on education. 2) Increase the basic allotment per student. 3) Full funding for universal PreK.

Discussion from the board included comments from Trustees Foreman and Flores asking for Universal Pre-K to be inclusive of all four year olds.


Two district leadership teams worked alongside 84 teachers to write curriculum for Reading, Language Arts, and Social Studies. Over 600 teachers applied to participate in this effort and 84 ultimately contributed energy and resources towards finalizing unit plans for teachers. In terms of Math and Science. the district is still in the process of onboarding curriculum writers and will launch the curriculum next year.

The curriculum includes 3 broad pillars:

  • Outline of TEKS to be taught in each six weeks with focus on weaknesses to address student needs.

  • Professional Learning Community package to be used during common planning: unpacked TEKS, exemplar lessons, etc. 

  • Preview of the six weeks at a glance to train teachers prior to implementing six weeks unit plans.

The curriculum includes differentiated instructional ideas for various groups of students - special education, talented and gifted, English language learners, and others. In addition, the leadership team is collecting video to demonstrate the curriculum in action as an example and will continue to visit classrooms to collect feedback on implementation of the curriculum. Currently, there is an effort to raise awareness that the curriculum exists at all for teachers around the district.

Board discussion included questions from Trustee Foreman on the selection of the teachers, to which the district shared there was an extensive vetting process that narrowed the field of 600+ teachers to 84 final curriculum writers. Trustee Foreman also raised concerns around flexibility for teachers who are using this curriculum - the administration shared that the curriculum should function more as a guide and resource than as a lesson script.

Trustee Resendez wanted to ensure social-emotional learning was embedded in the curriculum and the presenters shared that it was built in. Trustee Pinkerton asked about how far in advance the teachers would have the curriculum available and the answer was at least six weeks. Overall, the board was grateful for this resource.


The board took a moment from the briefing to sign off that they “shall not assume a supervisory role with staff or students.” Each month the board signs off on a different statement for self-evaluation, prompting Trustee Foreman to request an overview of the time required to spend on these periodic self-evaluations through the Lone Star Governance integrity instrument from Texas Education Agency.


The final item on the agenda relating to student outcomes was about the Texas Education Agency Virtual Schools Network and their offering of 90+ high school, AP, and dual credit online courses. Texas code says these courses must be offered and students must be informed of their availability. One comment from Trustee Foreman was about getting clarification on how attendance is configured for online participation and what the role of the school staff is when managing these courses.

For full video clips of board discussion or for a closer review of each agenda item. please visit the Board Docs site with all public materials. Questions about this summary? Email 

September Board Briefing: Principals, Collegiate Academies, and More!

Monday Sept 17.jpg


At a board briefing, our Dallas ISD Board discusses items they will need to vote on in upcoming meetings. They also hear reports from the Superintendent & the Dallas ISD Administration on ways in which the district is meeting student needs. Below is a summary of the seven-hour long briefing on September 13th, 2018.



The district has set four student outcome goals. The administration presented on progress for one of those goals.

  • Goal #2 - Student achievement on the third-grade state assessment in reading at “Approaches” or above will increase from 62% to 75% by 2022.

Data from student assessments in Kindergarten, 1st grade, and 2nd grade show growth in all grades from 2016-2017 to 2017-2018. Below are the results from the ISIP assessment, showing results from the beginning of the year (BOY) compared to the end of the year (EOY).

Growth in all grades.png

The Dallas ISD administration shared the success of one particular school, Harlee Elementary, that has continued to outshine the district over the last four years. Three different sample assessment results show this success below:

Screen Shot 2018-09-14 at 3.50.46 PM.png

The board’s response to the presentation included questions and comments from Trustees Marshall, Henry, and Blackburn asking how the success from Harlee could be replicated across more district schools.


The P-TECH program is a collaboration between a DISD high school, a college, and an industry partner. Across the state of Texas, Dallas ISD holds more than half of all the state designated P-TECH schools (18).

Dallas ISD Administration reported that these early college P-TECH programs have a high retention rate compared to students who are not in the collegiate academies. In terms of ethnic makeup, the student population is also comparable to students who are not in the collegiate academies.

Below are some data points the DISD Administration reported from two program years of P-TECH (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2) and compared it to students that are not in the collegiate academies as well as to the state average.

P TECH STAAR:EOC Performance.png

Board discussion included comments from Trustee Foreman asking for the opportunities of the collegiate academies to be expanded to more high schools & students.


Principals are key to success in schools and DISD has seen that turnover rate for principals is growing. To address this issue, the administration is working on a succession plan that includes building assistant principals into principals as well as continuing to coach other staff that are looking for this and other leadership opportunities. The plan is comprised of four pillars:

  • Attract: Define leadership competencies, identify high-potential candidates, provide incentives for continuing education, and provide communication for outreach between leadership stakeholders.

  • Prepare: Provide internal professional development and establish distributive leadership models.

  • Develop: Build and leverage external partnerships for principal development, support the executive directors (who work with principals), and offer districtwide leadership professional development sessions.

  • Retention: Recognize outstanding leaders, offer choices for professional development, grant earned autonomies, strengthen a feedback loop for improved effectiveness, and continue supporting schools with Funds for Racial Equity (FARE).

Board discussion included comments from Trustee Marshall who wanted to ensure we ‘thought big’ when it came to leveraging principal development, as it has great potential to drive improvement.


The Theory of Action describes how to get from the DISD Vision (“to be a premier urban district”) to meeting the student outcome goals (4 goals set by board and superintendent). The Theory of Action has 4 pillars -

  • Standards of Service - All schools should receive consistent standards of service.

  • Managed Instruction - All schools should have a managed foundation that comes from state laws and DISD leadership.

  • School Performance Ratings - Every year, schools are rated with the School Performance Framework.

  • Flexibility and Empowerment: Based on ratings, schools earn autonomies.

The ratings come from the School Performance Framework, which highlights that growth matters, not just state distinctions.

  • 50% of rating comes from state accountability

  • 30% of rating comes from student growth

  • 15% of rating comes stop student, staff, and parent surveys

  • 5% of rating comes from student participation in extracurricular

The framework identifies schools with the following names:

Screen Shot 2018-09-17 at 1.29.08 PM.png

Currently, the following schools have received Accomplished ratings:

Screen Shot 2018-09-17 at 1.35.29 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-09-17 at 1.35.44 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-09-17 at 1.35.52 PM.png

Board discussion included a comment from Trustee Pinkerton in ensuring that the Standards of Service (as they currently stand in the Theory of Action & School Performance Framework resources) are measurable and SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Time-bound).


Board members signed off on a document that was presented by the Dallas ISD Administration related to governance. The document is from the LoneStar Governance Integrity instrument and asks board members to agree that they “shall not act in an unprofessional manner when working with staff and administration” and “shall not be engaged in day to day administrative issues.”

There was no board discussion as the board signed the documentation.


The University of Pittsburgh Institute for Learning is providing professional learning and support to 12 DISD secondary schools serving predominantly African American, Latino, English Learner, and low-income students. The purpose would be to partner with schools to problem solve and support student achievement (with attention to literacy).

Board discussion included comments from Trustee Henry to consider adding a South Dallas school to the list of chosen campuses.

#7 STUDENT OUTCOME GOALS FOR 2018-2019 (T0 MEET BY 2021-2022)

The Dallas ISD Administration, under the Superintendent’s guidance, has proposed changes to the existing student outcome goals. The current goals state:

  1. Student achievement on state assessments in all subjects at Approaches or above will increase from 66 percent to 75 percent by 2022. 

  2. Student achievement on the third-grade state assessment in reading at Approaches or above will increase from 62 percent to 75 percent by 2022. 

  3. Student achievement on state assessments in two or more subjects at Meets or above will increase from 34 percent to 40 percent by 2022. 

  4. Student participation in extra-curricular or co-curricular activities will increase from 59 percent to 65 percent by 2022. 

The proposed changes are:

  1. Student achievement on state assessments in all subjects in Domain 1* will increase from 39% (2016-2017) to 47%. 

  2. Student achievement on the 3rdgrade state assessment in Reading at the Meets* level or above shall increase from 32.5% (2015-2016) to 45%.

  3. Graduates who are college, career, or military ready (CCMR) from Domain 1 will increase from 45% (2016-2017) to 50%. (This entire goal is new.*)

  4. Student extracurricular or co-curricular participation will increase from 59% (2016-2017) to 78%.*

*changes to existing goals

Board discussion from trustees indicated the need for more time to digest and process the goals prior to sharing more feedback.


The Dallas ISD Administration will hold a public hearing on September, 27th to discuss and review improvement plans for Pease, Holmes, Atwell, and Patton.

For full video clips of board discussion or for a closer review of each agenda item. please visit the Board Docs site with all public materials. Questions about this summary? Email 

August Board Briefing: First Meeting of the Year!

Monday Board Briefing Image.jpg

What is a Board Briefing?

At a board briefing, our Dallas ISD Board discusses items they will need to vote on in upcoming meetings. They also hear reports from the Superintendent & the Dallas ISD Administration on ways in which the district is meeting student needs. Below is a summary of the nine-hour long briefing on August 9th, 2018.


#1 Student Outcome Goals 1 & 3

The district has set four student outcome goals. The administration presented on progress for two of those goals.

  • Goal #1 - Student achievement on state assessments in all subjects at "Approaches" or above will increase to 75% by 2022. 
  • Goal #3 - Student achievement on state assessments in two or more subjects at "Meets" or above will increase from 34% by 2022. 


The reports presented on student achievement for 2018 indicate that our students, teachers, support staff, and leadership teams have made gains that exceed the state average in almost all categories for grades 3-8 on STAAR assessments. 

Amazing Gains.png

In addition, the district presented the A-F Accountability system which gives the district a letter grade (campuses will also receive letter grades). This grade is a combination of student achievement, student progress, and closing gaps for our student populations. 

In response to the presentation from the administration, Trustee Foreman presented a concern in regards to the gap between the state's absolute achievement compared to Dallas ISD. She made the point that while we are looking at data that indicates great gains, we are still lagging behind the state's average achievement results. Trustee Henry raised concerns about supporting our African-American student population as it currently shows that this student group's data is lower than other student groups. Trustee Resendez focused his comments on the cause behind the positive results - the Superintendent shared that it is a result of collective work, setting student outcome goals, and the ACE initiative. Finally, Trustee Marshall asked about the letter grade the district will receive and how we 'get points' for closing gaps for each student group the district serves.

#2 Funds for Achieving Racial Equity (FARE)

Dallas ISD student achievement results have created an opportunity to build in a FARE proposal to support racial equity strategic initiatives. At the briefing, 19 schools were included in a preliminary list for receiving additional support from FARE. This list will be modified once the state shares final data from state assessments. 

List of FARE Campuses.png

Board discussion include comments from Trustee Marshall on the comparatively low amount of FARE funds when looking at previous proposals. Superintendent Hinojosa shared that the lower amount is a result of overall improved performance in the district and therefore fewer 'fragile' schools in need of these funds. Trustees Solis and Henry made comment on considering additional barriers that may still bring challenges even if a school receives FARE support. Trustees Micciche and Blackburn wanted to ensure schools were selected for this support in an equitable manner. Finally, Trustee Pinkerton wanted to know the connection between FARE and the new Office of Racial Equity. Below are comments by Trustee Foreman speaking to the need to honestly assess and addresses the needs of African American students. 

#3 Tax Ratification Election (TRE)

The growth that has occurred in Dallas ISD is due to initiatives that cost money, and the district has "managed on a shoestring budget." The administration recommends that the board give stakeholders an opportunity to vote on a 13 cent TRE, which results in additional funds to support the strategic initiatives that have benefitted students. Without these additional funds, the district would need to make cuts and the initiatives that are working now would only be continued with significant cuts to operating costs. Take a look at the formula the administration presented for taxpayers & voters:

Because this is the third time this vote has come to the board, there was limited discussion from board members. One point that Trustees Solis and Henry brought up related to how to articulate the need for a TRE approval by voters, should the board allow for it to be on the ballot. Trustee Pinkerton raised the concern around the decreasing fund balance across the years, even with an approved TRE from taxpayers for 2018. 

The administration is hosting two community meetings this week to provide more information about a TRE. Tuesday, 8/14 at Pinkston High School and Wednesday, 8/15 at Madison High School. Both meetings begin at 6pm. 

#4 Long Range Master Plan for Technology

Each campus was reviewed by the administration to assess the needs of schools across Dallas ISD. Based on the administration's recommendations, campus staff will receive professional development to implement the technology plan. Two plans were presented by the administration to the board and the Superintendent made the comment that the goal would be to ensure every student has a personal device (starting in 3rd grade) and that all classrooms have audio and visual devices (LED monitor) for teacher use. 

The board discussion included comments from Trustee Foreman on making sure that prior to giving students a personal device, there is quality Wi-Fi on all campuses. Beyond that, Trustee Blackburn gave feedback on ensuring the technology proposal aligned with curriculum for our students.

#5 Safety Plan

A few months ago, the governor met with leadership from Dallas ISD and made several recommendations to keep students safe (in light of recent school shootings). The administration was happy to share that half of the recommendations are already in their plans or are being implemented. Thus far this school year, Dallas ISD administration has trained all high school principals on safety - how to deal with emergencies, how to address mental health issues, and behaviors to watch for in our students. Aside from that, the Dallas ISD Police Department is able to communication more efficiently with the Dallas Police Department, and that will be critical should an emergency arise. DISD is working to have both preventative plans (mental health) as well as proactive responses to emergencies (securing entry to campuses).

From the board, several trustees pointed out that the use of detectors is somewhat problematic given the fact that they require upkeep and additional personnel to be effective. 

#6 Student Transportation Plan

The year is almost underway and the transportation team in Dallas ISD has worked to ensure students have transportation on the first day of school. From over 1,000 positions needing to be filled, the representative from the transportation team stated that the department is only 12 bus drivers short and there are still several days to fill those positions or modify routes. Costumer service is a key priority and there are a few ways to reach out to the Dallas ISD transportation team: 1) Visit the Dallas ISD website, go to 'Departments,' and click on 'Transportation' for resources; 2) Email; 3) call 972-925-4BUS.

Discussion from the board members included a comment from Trustee Marshall on implementing swiping and tracking abilities for all students so that parents can use an app to see if their child has made it safely to school.

#7 Board Self-Evaluation

The board received a report from the administration on two self-evaluations from June and August. The board is asked to sign off that they "shall not assume a supervisory role with staff and students" and "shall not act in an unprofessional manner when working with staff and administration." Additionally, the administration presented points from the Lone Star Governance integrity instrument:

  • 1/15 Points for “Vision 1” – The Board works collaboratively with the superintendent to develop the vision and student outcome goals.
  • 1/15 Points for “Vision 2” – “The board has adopted goal progress measures aligned to each goal.
  • 9/10 Points for “Vision 3” – The board has adopted a vision for what student outcomes will be and has adopted constraints aligned with that vision.
  • 0.5/5 Points for “Vision 4” – The board has adopted constraint progress measures aligned to each constraint.
  • 0/15 points for “Accountability 1” – The board invests at least half of its time focusing on its vision and goals.
  • 0/5 Points for “Accountability 2” – The board measures and communicates, but does not interfere in, progress toward the vision and student outcome goals.
  • 0/15 points for “Structure” – The board delegates to the Superintendent operational authority to accomplish the vision and student outcome goals.
  •  10/10 Points for “Unity” – The board works collaboratively with the Superintendent to lead toward the vision and student outcome goals.

There was no discussion from the board.

#8 Racial Equity & Implicit Bias Suppliers

The new Racial Equity Department had a presentation on the three organizations which would provide racial equity & implicit bias training. The three organizations included - Pacific Educational Group, Generation Ready, and Border Crossers. As stated by Jamila Thomas from the Racial Equity Office, "The outcomes of the office are - 1) Race is no longer a determinant for one's social and economic outcome and 2) Our life outcomes can no longer be pre-determined by our race." The process includes "First, acknowledging and accounting for past inequities. Second, providing opportunities that promote racial healing (courageous conversations). Third, having targeted interventions for targeted populations."

The board initially presented concerns on the training suppliers but the Racial Equity team explained the role of each organization and ultimately received positive feedback from the board. Trustee Blackburn asked about the timing of training and the Racial Equity team responded that new teachers have already received training and that top leadership will be a priority for receiving training.

#9 Elections

There are plans to include several finance-related ballot items for Dallas ISD in the November election. The ballot items that were a priority in the administration's presentation included:

  • Setting a tax rate at $1.17, prompting a Tax Ratification Election for voter approval.
  • Calling a bond election for - 1) $75 million for long-term bus replacement and a bus facility and 2) Refinancing an existing debt of $75 million from 2015.
  • Selecting a method to reduce property wealth when the state recaptures funds from DISD.

For full video clips of board discussion or for a closer review of each agenda item. please visit the Board Docs site with all public materials. Questions about this summary? Email 

June Board Briefing: Last Briefing of 2017-2018


In the last month of the 2017-2018 school board meetings, the June Briefing agenda was packed! Below are some key issues with a summary of the administration’s presentation and the board’s response.

Data for Student Outcome Goals 1 & 3

End of Course Data was shared by the administration highlighting progress towards 2 of the 4 district goals. The data below is a sample set that demonstrates progress towards meeting the goal.

Goal 1.jpg
Goal 3.jpg

The data above represents significant progress towards meeting the district goals and it is all thanks to the collective staff at the Dallas ISD campuses, the leadership of central staff, and board advocacy in support of a concerted focus on student achievement.

The board did not discuss the content of the presentation at length, but, on behalf of the board, Board President Dan Micciche congratulated the district for all of its work.

School Health Advisory Council

The administration and the School Health Advisory Council presented recommendations to the board for promoting health in our DISD classrooms and schools.

The goals include vetting curriculum on an annual basis, growing representation from each district on the advisory council, and prioritizing parental engagement in support of our students’ well-being.

The five specific recommendations included:

  • Reinstate the Youth Risk Behavior Survey

  • Reinstate a coordinator position for the Urban School Wellness Department

  • Promote a local wellness policy

  • Implement a wellness checklist for our schools

  • Prioritize a human growth and sexuality program for grades 6-8 and one additional credit course for high school students

The board discussion included concerns from Trustees Marshall, Nutall, and Blackburn about the curriculum used in classrooms. Trustee Foreman pushed for SHAC to ensure parents understand opt-out is an option.

Early College High School Program Expansion

The early college high schools in Dallas ISD have been one of the more prominent initiatives in the district that have both supported student access to college as well as recruitment for new students in our district. The administration presented two new programs for the 2019-2020 school year, which will begin planning in the 2018-2019 school year.

  • Cedar Valley College will partner with Skyline High School and 9th-10th graders will continue to attend classes on the Skyline campus while 11th-12th graders will take courses at the Cedar Valley campus.

  • North Lake College will partner with DISD to replicate the model of Trini Garza - all four years of high school will be on the college campus.

The board discussion on this agenda item came from Trustees Foreman and Marshall asking the administration to explore additional funding options for early college programs.

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Scores

This assessment, NAEP, was administered to 4th and 8th graders for reading and math. Typically, the results from this exam are compared to district across the country and do not account for the demographic of students that make up the district. For that reason, the administration compared the makeup of Dallas ISD to the make up of comparable districts and found that in math, our students are performing above average and in reading, our students are performing on average.

Board discussion from Trustees Resendez, Foreman, and Marshall related to reinforcing reading and reading initiatives across our schools.

2018-2019 Budget Proposal

The budget presented by the administration included an assumed tax increase for Dallas ISD taxpayers. If the tax increase passes through a Tax Ratification Election first through the board in August and then through a ballot vote in November, DISD employees will see a pay increase for their salaries. If the tax increase does not go through, there are no plans for a pay increase for staff.

Board discussion included the following comments from Trustees -

  • Trustee Blackburn: Pay increase should not be dependent on an increased tax rate.

  • Trustee Foreman: Community should be a part of the budget proposal and a tax attorney should approve the budget proposal with its tax rate assumption.

  • Trustee Marshall: Supportive of pay increase for teachers who have met specific performance metrics in their evaluations; concerns about where money should go without strong consideration of where the money would come from.

  • Trustee Pinkerton: Wants administration to ensure that there are adjustments to central staff costs as well, not just adjustments to campus costs.

  • Trustee Nutall: Wants to ensure investment in early childhood matches retention of students.

  • Trustee Resendez: Interested in how funds will be spent for racial equity work.

  • Trustee Micciche: Concerns on accurately communicating budget implications when it comes to topic of ‘recapture.’

Student Recruitment & Retention

The administration named retention strategies for our DISD students as well as recruitment efforts to gain additional students who are not currently served by the district.  

Retention Strategies -

  • Kinder & Bridge Camps - This is designed to help students in their transition years of Pre-K to Kindergarden, Kindergarten to 1st grade, 5th grade to 6th grade, and 8th grade to 9th grade. Students would have the opportunity to visit the school they would attend the following year to begin to get acclimated.

  • Summer Connection Fair, Open House, and Customer Service Training are all strategies used to invite family engagement to feel connected to the district and to learn more about the schools in their communities.

Recruitment Efforts -

  • There will be a Recruitment Team on every campus and marketing efforts from DISD staff will continue to invite current and new families to learn about DISD.

  • A campus-based initiative known as Operation Comeback will focus on calling students who are enrolled but not showing up to school once the school year begins.

  • The annual Discover ISD fair will be hosted in two different locations to accommodate families across our district and offer a showcase of the many different schools and special programs DISD has to offer.

Board discussion included suggestions from Trustee Foreman to visit churches, add suggestion boxes on campuses, and have the Superintendent do a robocall to households in the district. Trustee Marshall asked the administration to ensure our schools are prepared to offer school tours as parents show interest in visiting our campuses. Trustee Micciche reinforced outreach efforts that match or exceed the tools charter schools use to engage families.

Career Institutes

DISD currently offers programs that are geared towards preparing students for career immediately following high school graduation. However, the administration saw the need to better align the certificates and expectations of the industry with the DISD program offerings. With that, the administration proposed enhancing the qualities of existing programs and eventually striving to have an industry partner at each DISD high school.

Board discussion included Trustee Foreman’s comment that we cannot leave out schools that do not have any programs, and not only strengthen the existing programs. Trustees Flores and Pinkerton offered their help with finding new partnerships for our schools.


If you have any questions about the June Board Briefing, please do not hesitate to visit the Dallas ISD Board Meeting Agendas Website, or email our team at


May Board Briefing: Student Outcomes, Charters, Technology, and Budget


Progress on District’s Student Outcome Goals

The Dallas ISD administration and Superintendent Hinojosa presented progress towards meeting 2 of the 4 district goals:

  • Goal 1: Student achievement on state assessments in all subjects at “Approaches” or above will increase from 66% to 75% by 2022.
  • Goal 3: Student achievement on state assessments in two or more subjects at “Meets” or above will increase from 34% to 40% by 2022.

The sample data from a Reading and Math administration of state assessments in grades 5 and 8 showed the following:

Screen Shot 2018-05-10 at 1.31.06 PM.png

Our board expressed pride in the hard work of the students, teachers, leadership teams, and district administration in making this happen.

Charter School Partnership

The administration presented the possibility to use Senate Bill 1882, which allows school districts to partner with charter schools (and other eligible entities). In this particular partnership, St. Anthony’s - used to be a private Catholic school but is now a charter school - would have autonomy under governance, staff, schedule, curriculum, etc. The district would provide a school facility - Wheatley - and an advisory board that has continuous conversation around programs and student achievement at the campus.

The board had mixed support - Trustees Nutall, Foreman, Flores, and Blackburn showed support for this partnership; Trustees Pinkerton and Marshall were concerned about not receiving anything in return that would benefit the district’s budget; Trustee Solis had a mixed reaction of fascination about the concept and concern about unanswered questions; Trustee Micciche expressed the need for researching all necessary aspects before deciding to move forward; and Trustee Resendez did not publicly state an opinion on the matter.

Technology & Long Range Facilities Master Plan

A consulting team, Engage2Learn, alongside the administration, reported on a plan to implement technology and update facilities over the next couple of years. One of the highlights from the technology standpoint was an effort to provide a technological device (chromebook) to each student in the district - but if funding did not allow for it - to at least provide a device for every single high school student (elementary students and middle school students would share).

From a facilities standpoint, two major priorities in the next couple of years include replacing all equipment in buildings whose lifespan has or will expire in the next two years as well as modernizing classrooms (wall paint, new floor, whiteboards instead of chalkboards). The immediate next step will be to finalize a plan for technology and complete the facilities assessment across Dallas ISD campuses.

Budget Proposal

The administration and superintendent presented the budget for the 2018-2019 school year. One major difference is that the budget was presented assuming a higher tax rate for local residents. The projected enrollment, which impacts the budget, is a decrease of just over 1,700 students. In addition, state funding would decrease by 6.9% and federal funding would decrease by 2.4%.

Budget Image.jpg

For a full video of the meeting, visit

To ask questions about this summary, please email

April Board Briefing: Student Outcomes, Taxes, and Racial Equity


There are four district goals in Dallas ISD - three relate to the results of STAAR testing and one pertains to student participation in extracurricular activities.

  1. Students “approaching” grade level standard or above will increase to 75% across all subjects by 2022.

  2. Students “approaching” grade level standard or above will increase to 75% in 3rd grade Reading by 2022.

  3. Students “meeting” grade level standard or above will increase to 40% in two or more subjects by 2022.

  4. Student participation in extracurricular and co-curricular activities will increase to 65% by 2022.

Across various board meetings, the administration and superintendent present progress towards meeting these goals - where there is success, where there are challenges, and what the data shows about meeting the goals.

During the April School Board Briefing, Superintendent Hinojosa and the Dallas ISD administrative staff presented progress on the fourth goal: engagement in extracurricular activities from our DISD students. As of June 2017, 58.7% of students were participating in an extracurricular activity. By March 2017, 70.6% of students were participating in extracurricular activities. Needless to say, the district has exceeded the initial goal and it is something to celebrate.

Tax Ratification Election

Superintendent Hinojosa presented the possibility of the board approving a Tax Ratification Election (TRE) for voters who live within the Dallas ISD bounds. A Tax Ratification Election would mean that the school board decides whether or not voters can cast a ballot in favor or in opposition to a tax increase of 13 cents.

These additional funds would be used to sustain strategic initiatives, student outcome goals, and the district’s focus. Some of the initiatives named included magnet programs, early college high schools, and schools within the Office of Transformation and Innovation. If these funds support student outcome goals, it could help the DISD meet its student achievement goals.

Board discussion included themes around placing more pressure on state legislature to increase funding for local school districts, considering impact on families who are under financial duress, letting voters decide on the tax increase instead of the board, and communicating a timeline for a TRE.

Racial Equity

The second topic of the briefing that drew great anticipation from the public was the presentation from the administration on plans for addressing racial equity in the district. The presentation was a collaborative effort between Dallas ISD administrative staff and a research group from San Diego State University, National Center for Urban School Transformation.

This qualitative study by from NCUST  “sought to understand what they heard in interviewing people - 350 different teachers, principals, parents, students - and observed in about 500 different classrooms across 20 schools.” NCUST studied schools that “serve diverse communities and get great academic results for every demographic group they serve.”

After the study was executed in the fall, the district and San Diego group were tasked with providing recommendations to Dallas ISD. The recommendations included:

  • Develop a district equity office.

  • Develop a strategy that increases the likelihood that all students, particularly African American and English language learners, master state standards and graduate college and career ready.

  • Focus improvement in learning outcomes for all demographic groups, emphasize high levels of support for all schools through district offices, and mandate corrective action for schools that fail to make reasonable improvements.

Board discussion in response to the administration and NCUST’s presentation included themes around wanting more specificity for recommendations since it is not the first time racial equity work has been presented to the board.

The plan, according to Assistant Superintendent Leslie Williams, “We are gonna work with the non profit organizations, the city of Dallas, and take advantage of the resources in the different departments that we have within Dallas ISD to make sure we meet the needs of all students.”

If you have further questions about this summary of the board briefing, don’t hesitate to contact

For full viewing of board meetings, visit

Most Students Can’t Vote, But Their Voice Is Loud and Clear


Our students across the country have been taking center stage in the past few weeks by leading efforts for change. They have served as role models not only to one another but to the adults who are in positions of leadership, especially those in elected office.

At a local level, Dallas students have also voiced their thoughts. After discussing the role of the school board in Dallas ISD with middle and high school students, our young leaders have some things they’d like to share with our elected trustees.

Thank You...

- Marco, Grade 8 

- Marco, Grade 8 

- Benjamin, Grade 8

- Benjamin, Grade 8

- Kendrian, Grade 11

- Kendrian, Grade 11

Voicing concerns...

 Aileen, Grade 8

 Aileen, Grade 8

- Karla, Grade 8

- Karla, Grade 8

- Evelyn, Grade 8

- Evelyn, Grade 8

- Valery, Grade 8

- Valery, Grade 8

With students advocating for technology, more electives, funding for schools, and equity across schools - it is critical to keep these leading voices front and center. 


Pass the Baton

With 2,791 District 9 students enrolled in a campus with an “Improvement Required” label and two qualified candidates stepping up to run, Dallas Kids First is endorsing a vote for change in leadership. For nearly a decade, District 9 in Dallas ISD has had the same school board member in office. In 2012, Dallas Kids First endorsed this member, but by 2015 could no longer stand behind a voting pattern that raised more questions than it did solutions.

With a narrow victory in 2015, the incumbent was able to stay on the school board for another three years. Of 3,922 voters, 52% supported the incumbent; and only 7% of eligible, registered voters participated in this decision.

A combined 2,106 voters chose to re-elect the same leadership for a total of 29 schools - representing 23,696 students and even more households.

While other members on the board have led policy efforts to make sure Dallas ISD students across all campuses have their needs met (breakfast for students, restorative discipline policy, etc.), the current trustee has missed opportunities to address the concerns of a diverse District 9 community, and an equally diverse Dallas ISD consituent-base.

Passing the baton to a solutions-focused representative on the school board would be a positive change for Dallas ISD and District 9. In the 2016-2017 school year, Dallas Kids First tracked high-impact decisions voted on by the school board. These decisions translated into board members voting on items that could either help or hinder students, teachers, and effective school board governance.

High-Impact Votes by School Board:

  • Turnaround plans to support schools with  “Improvement Required” label

  • Expanding student opportunity for PreK

  • Advocating for funding to meet District’s student outcome goals

  • Asking voters to support a $1.6 billion bond for improved facilities

On average, the Dallas ISD school board supported these topics with 90% approval. In District 9, these high-impact votes were supported 68% of the time.


Local elections matter and a development of civic engagement across the nation has inspired the local Dallas ISD school board race for District 9.

Campaign season typically starts closer to March, but 2018 brought an early start for a community ready to cast a vote. By November, two promising candidates publicly shared their interest in running for the same school board seat as challengers to the sitting incumbent. Two experienced individuals running at the same time for the same seat further highlight an inspired base of new leaders looking to get involved - not just at the voting poll, but on the ballot.

Given the qualifications of both candidates, Dallas Kids First considered four options throughout the five-step endorsement process.

  • endorse Edward Turner

  • endorse Justin Henry

  • do not make an endorsement

  • make an endorsement for change

Considering the interview panel, community input through DKF’s endorsement survey , and the DKF advisory team, it became apparent to all: By endorsing Edward Turner, DKF would be denying the fact that Justin Henry is deeply invested in supporting student outcomes. By endorsing Justin Henry, DKF would be ignoring Edward Turner’s commitment to the community in support of schools.

The DKF team works year-round alongside schools, educators, community partners, and elected officials to advocate for student outcomes. By not making an endorsement at all, all efforts would have been in vain and not aligned to mission - raise awareness, organize voters.

Henry and Turner are each rising stars for the local landscape and, in making a dual endorsement, Dallas Kids First is positioned to support each of their campaign efforts - all while shedding light on missed opportunities for District 9 in the last nine years.

With an evolving education landscape, it is time for the leadership in District 9 to evolve too.

Voter Turnout.jpg

Find out if you or your friends can vote for this election here!

Find out if you are registered to vote here!

Click here to read about Edward Turner’s “Focus for District 9.”

Click here to read Justin Henry’s “Issues” page.

Click here for some critical ‘NO’ votes by current District 9 incumbent.

Dallas Kids First 2018 Candidate Endorsement Announcement

DKF Student Voice.jpg

For Districts 1 and 3, Dallas Kids First stands behind unopposed incumbents and DKF-endorsed Trustees Dan Micciche and Edwin Flores, respectively.

For District 9, Dallas Kids First supports a vote for change in school board leadership via a dual endorsement, empowering voters to support one of two strong candidates suited for leadership. Dallas Kids First endorses Justin Henry and Edward Turner for Dallas ISD School Board.

DKF Endorsement.jpg

After completing its 2018 endorsement process - a combination of candidate questionnaire responses, a community interview panel, and community survey responses - Dallas Kids First endorses a vote for change in leadership by empowering voters to choose one of two strong candidates, Justin Henry or Edward Turner, for Dallas ISD's District 9. Our community panel was made up of 25 members, including current DISD students, teachers and staff, District 9 residents, CAMP Fellows, and DKF members.

DKF Students.jpg

Below are some key comments from panelists:

  • District 9 Dallas ISD teacher and CAMP Fellow Emily Barksdale shared, “Justin Henry wants improvement in student achievement, college readiness etc - especially through a racial equity lens.” Henry stated, “we are in a crisis” and “the current status quo is unacceptable.” He emphasizes the need to “create an environment conducive to partnerships.”

  • District 9 middle school student and interview panelist Marquies Buekner shared, “Edward Turner wants what is best for students, [he has] a very great sense of urgency… can relate to District 9 because he grew up here and that is what drives him.” Turner stated, “As a trustee, be conscious of power, use this for good, not abuse. Be an example for students.”

Founded to address years of low voter turnout, Dallas Kids First continues its efforts to make school board candidate information more accessible to a diverse constituent base. The Dallas Kids First scorecards outline candidates' strengths and areas of growth aligned to qualities of effective board leadership.

With the election just two months away, Dallas Kids First is calling on Dallas ISD constituents to commit time and resources to increase participation in the May 5, 2018 election. Advocate alongside DKF and let us know your interests by clicking here:

Each candidate's scorecard along with their questionnaire responses are available on the 2018 election page,